Today's hottest deals

Acer Nitro AN515-43

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive147% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Nitro AN515-43  (all builds)
MotherboardPK Octavia_PKS
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201105
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 22 '21 at 07:36
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
32.9% Below average
Memory 23
1-Core 70.5
2-Core 118
37% 70.5 Pts
4-Core 229
8-Core 390
38% 309 Pts
64-Core 416
26% 416 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
Acer(1025 1366) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.28
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.19% Terrible
Lighting 2.7
Reflection 54.4
Parallax 3.7
2% 20.3 fps
MRender 3
Gravity 2.8
Splatting 2.3
2% 2.7 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 2.19%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$71
333GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1056 1231 1249 1239 703 176 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
147% Outstanding
Read 976
Write 1,107
Mixed 1,008
SusWrite 942
228% 1,008 MB/s
4K Read 32.8
4K Write 59.1
4K Mixed 31.7
122% 41.2 MB/s
DQ Read 371
DQ Write 216
DQ Mixed 352
246% 313 MB/s
Poor: 144%
This bench: 147%
Great: 295%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB
407GB free
Firmware: ACM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 150 146 155 156 159 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
77.8% Very good
Read 122
Write 164
Mixed 50.9
SusWrite 149
88% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.4
104% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4SFRA266.M8FR Hynix HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
27.4% Poor
MC Read 7.7
MC Write 7.4
MC Mixed 14
28% 9.7 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 12.2
27% 9.5 GB/s
Latency 300
13% 300 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 27.4%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Nitro AN515-43 Builds (Compare 1,764 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN515-43

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback