Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

Performance Results


Gaming 25% Surfboard	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	31.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	153% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (64%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0 (all builds)
Memory	10 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191113
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 22 '21 at 02:23
Run Duration	167 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	64%

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon 200GE-$52 12,631 User benchmarks, average bench 54% AM4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	51.1% Above average	Memory 57.7 1-Core 67.3 2-Core 127 49% 83.9 Pts	4-Core 258 8-Core 257 34% 258 Pts	64-Core 256 16% 256 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 51.1% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198 440,282 User benchmarks, average bench 33% MSI(1462 3201) 2GB CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 497.29 Performing below potential (28^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	31.3% Below average	Lighting 39.2 Reflection 50.8 Parallax 32.2 32% 40.7 fps	MRender 32.4 Gravity 41.3 Splatting 35.8 30% 36.5 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 31.3% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 5,987 User benchmarks, average bench 191% 125GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 669 876 679 160 141 139 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	153% Outstanding	Read 1,045 Write 966 Mixed 995 SusWrite 444 194% 862 MB/s	4K Read 44.7 4K Write 80.8 4K Mixed 55.2 181% 60.2 MB/s	DQ Read 734 DQ Write 488 DQ Mixed 593 448% 605 MB/s
Poor: 122% ↑ This bench: 153% Great: 239%
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$63 60,851 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 290GB free Firmware: SVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 328 417 426 430 450 392 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	111% Outstanding	Read 478 Write 448 Mixed 430 SusWrite 407 99% 441 MB/s	4K Read 39.8 4K Write 74.1 4K Mixed 49.5 163% 54.5 MB/s	DQ Read 379 DQ Write 349 DQ Mixed 362 272% 363 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 130%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 2GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 1GB free, PID 0722 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.3 7.4 7.5 7.4 7.4 7.4 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	9.85% Terrible	Read 17.7 Write 6.7 Mixed 5.2 SusWrite 7.4 11% 9.25 MB/s	4K Read 3.2 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 2 134% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 9.85% Great: 10%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown AHL16E6SC8G8E8G32K 2x8GB 59 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	87% Excellent	MC Read 34.5 MC Write 36.5 MC Mixed 29.5 96% 33.5 GB/s	SC Read 16.5 SC Write 24.1 SC Mixed 18.4 56% 19.7 GB/s	Latency 135 30% 135 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 87% Great: 103%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A320M-HDV R4.0 Builds (Compare 6,077 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 39%

Jet ski

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R4.0

CPU
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $140Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	877x
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	722x
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $84Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	551x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	465x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	433x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	408x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	206x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $41Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	159x
SU630 240GBAdataBench 64%, 60,212 samples	154x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	135x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBUnknownBench 85%, 99,207 samples	129x
DDR4 3000 2x8GBAdataBench 80%, 77,202 samples	116x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 91% - Outstanding

Total price: $337

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $120
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363