Today's hottest deals

Asus MAXIMUS VIII HERO ALPHA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 96%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive250% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VIII HERO ALPHA  (all builds)
Memory24.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 17 '21 at 00:03
Run Duration395 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 27%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$148
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
88.7% Excellent
Memory 96.5
1-Core 131
2-Core 245
90% 157 Pts
4-Core 436
8-Core 736
71% 586 Pts
64-Core 728
45% 728 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 497.09
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
102% Outstanding
Lighting 128
Reflection 139
Parallax 142
104% 136 fps
MRender 117
Gravity 134
Splatting 117
100% 123 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 102%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$100
623GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1040 1184 1196 1205 1290 1317 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
250% Outstanding
Read 2,397
Write 1,727
Mixed 1,591
SusWrite 1,205
386% 1,730 MB/s
4K Read 61.7
4K Write 33
4K Mixed 49.6
175% 48.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,147
DQ Write 70
DQ Mixed 128
214% 448 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 250%
Great: 372%
Hitachi HUS724040ALE640 4TB
28GB free
Firmware: MJAO
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 40 38 38 38 41 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
42% Average
Read 108
Write 35.1
Mixed 44.6
SusWrite 38.1
42% 56.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 42%
Great: 91%
WD Red 6TB (2014)-$140
112GB free
Firmware: 0A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 107 98 99 99 108 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
78.7% Very good
Read 172
Write 166
Mixed 125
SusWrite 102
105% 141 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
194% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 99%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$28
56GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 72 69 68 69 76 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
53.3% Above average
Read 117
Write 108
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 68.5
64% 86.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
178% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 83%
WD WD20EURS-63S48Y0 2TB
1GB free
Firmware: 51.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 62.5
Write 65.3
Mixed 46.8
43% 58.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 77%
WD Red 10TB (2017)-$419
2TB free
Firmware: 0A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 134 128 131 130 135 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
75.7% Very good
Read 131
Write 142
Mixed 98.4
SusWrite 132
93% 126 MB/s
4K Read 2.5
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 1.2
330% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 114%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$79
1GB free
Firmware: 51.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 98.2
Write 89.3
Mixed 60.5
61% 82.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
139% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 31% Great: 67%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$28
1GB free
Firmware: 80.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 67.4
Write 67.1
Mixed 56.6
48% 63.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
105% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 83%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$28
3GB free
Firmware: 80.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 118
Write 101
Mixed 62.1
70% 93.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
186% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 83%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$90
3GB free
Firmware: 80.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 102
Write 100
Mixed 53.7
63% 85.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
178% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 87%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$90
5GB free
Firmware: 80.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 102
Write 94.1
Mixed 57.4
63% 84.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 87%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$80
13GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 104 105 105 104 97 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
60.2% Good
Read 108
Write 96.2
Mixed 51.9
SusWrite 102
65% 89.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
189% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 101%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$28
0GB free
Firmware: 80.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 84.9
Write 67.5
Mixed 57.8
52% 70.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
99% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 83%
Amd-raid WDC WD40EFAX-68J 4TB
25GB free
Firmware: 82.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 60 62 63 63 59 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
53.9% Above average
Read 122
Write 114
Mixed 59.6
SusWrite 61.7
66% 89.5 MB/s
4K Read 5.1
4K Write 7.7
4K Mixed 1.1
477% 4.63 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 110%
WD Green 2TB (2010)-$100
8GB free
Firmware: 51.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 61 63 63 63 61 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
35.3% Below average
Read 61.1
Write 70.2
Mixed 58.1
SusWrite 61.7
47% 62.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
106% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 68%
Seagate ST14000NE0008-2JK101 14TB
8.5TB free
Firmware: EN01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 239 242 249 250 248 233 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 11% Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3068 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 37.9
MC Write 39.1
MC Mixed 33.2
105% 36.7 GB/s
SC Read 22.3
SC Write 41.8
SC Mixed 33.5
93% 32.5 GB/s
Latency 52.1
77% 52.1 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 104%
Great: 131%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VIII HERO ALPHA Builds (Compare 1,042 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VIII HERO ALPHA - $240

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $688
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback