Hp-pavilion NY810AV-ABA e9150t

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics16.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHp-pavilion NY810AV-ABA e9150t  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON TRUCKEE
Memory9.2 GB free of 14 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090430
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 16 '21 at 19:07
Run Duration253 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-920-$90
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
66.4% Good
Memory 85.3
1-Core 69.9
2-Core 136
60% 97.2 Pts
4-Core 263
8-Core 345
39% 304 Pts
64-Core 345
21% 345 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
CLim: 1489 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
16.9% Very poor
Lighting 20.5
Reflection 19.9
Parallax 19.2
17% 19.9 fps
MRender 24.8
Gravity 21.7
Splatting 17.9
17% 21.5 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 16.9%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO 250GB
196GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 183 185 188 189 185 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive
Read 256
Write 194
Mixed 240
SusWrite 166
48% 214 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 40.6
4K Mixed 31.6
101% 32.7 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 197
148% 198 MB/s
Poor: 83% Great: 132%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
240GB free
Firmware: CC4D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 37 95 90 94 92 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Read 137
Write 29.7
Mixed 71.2
SusWrite 68
57% 76.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 112%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA300 3TB
1TB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 22 23 23 23 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
15.4% Very poor
Read 30.5
Write 26.2
Mixed 26.6
SusWrite 22.6
35% 26.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
89% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.4%
Great: 71%
Generic- Compact Flash 4GB
4GB free, PID 7462
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 22 22 22 22 22 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
17.3% Very poor
Read 28.9
Write 25.3
Mixed 10.2
SusWrite 21.5
28% 21.5 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
128% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 14GB
null MHz
2048, 4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
35.5% Below average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 11.1
MC Mixed 10.4
34% 11.8 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 9
SC Mixed 11.1
29% 10 GB/s
Latency 71.7
56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 35.5%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NY810AV-ABA e9150t Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Hp-pavilion NY810AV-ABA e9150t

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $269
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback