Today's hottest deals

MSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics22% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive174% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B79
MotherboardMSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79)  (all builds)
Memory28.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210926
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 15 '21 at 18:49
Run Duration431 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
81.8% Excellent
Memory 82.6
1-Core 112
2-Core 219
78% 138 Pts
4-Core 436
8-Core 637
67% 536 Pts
64-Core 812
50% 812 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M2000
Dell(1028 1190) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1228 MHz, MLim: 1651 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 472.84
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
22% Poor
Lighting 26.6
Reflection 30.5
Parallax 28
22% 28.4 fps
MRender 25.2
Gravity 28.5
Splatting 28.9
23% 27.5 fps
Poor: 20%
This bench: 22%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P2 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$39
154GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P2CR045 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1360 1375 458 271 82 75 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
174% Outstanding
Read 1,085
Write 1,384
Mixed 1,170
SusWrite 604
239% 1,061 MB/s
4K Read 47.1
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 63.7
210% 73.1 MB/s
DQ Read 729
DQ Write 546
DQ Mixed 722
517% 666 MB/s
Poor: 88%
This bench: 174%
Great: 228%
Seagate ST31500541AS 1.5TB
816GB free
Firmware: CC34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 25 40 38 65 40 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
22.5% Poor
Read 36.5
Write 71.7
Mixed 34.3
SusWrite 41.9
34% 46.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
98% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 22.5%
Great: 56%
Toshiba DT01ABA200 2TB
126GB free
Firmware: MZ4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 131 127 129 128 124 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
73.2% Very good
Read 128
Write 128
Mixed 25.1
SusWrite 127
74% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
132% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 85%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$36
18GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 85 74 90 113 96 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
47.1% Average
Read 71.6
Write 67.5
Mixed 50.1
SusWrite 92.2
52% 70.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
141% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BL8G32C16U4R.M8FE1 BL8G32C16U4R.8FE BL8G32C16U4R.M8FE1 BL8G32C16U4R.8FE 32GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
112% Outstanding
MC Read 43.3
MC Write 40
MC Mixed 38.3
116% 40.5 GB/s
SC Read 27.6
SC Write 42.3
SC Mixed 33.8
99% 34.6 GB/s
Latency 75.8
53% 75.8 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 112%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79) Builds (Compare 5,086 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PLUS MAX (MS-7B79)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $490
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback