Dell Latitude E6530

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive38.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell Latitude E6530  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 07Y85M
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170508
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 14 '21 at 13:51
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3740QM-$220
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Memory 79.6
1-Core 95
2-Core 187
69% 120 Pts
4-Core 374
8-Core 369
50% 372 Pts
64-Core 366
23% 366 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 74%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM851 2.5 7mm 256GB
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT08D0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 49 40 46 46 38 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38.7% Below average
Read 164
Write 41.3
Mixed 64.9
SusWrite 44.9
17% 78.8 MB/s
4K Read 18.2
4K Write 26
4K Mixed 18.8
65% 21 MB/s
DQ Read 361
DQ Write 49.6
DQ Mixed 57.1
80% 156 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 90%
Samsung PM841 2.5" 256GB
69GB free
Firmware: DXT03D0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 242 243 245 243 243 243 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
66.1% Good
Read 330
Write 217
Mixed 142
SusWrite 243
52% 233 MB/s
4K Read 21.8
4K Write 43.2
4K Mixed 20.7
82% 28.6 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 215
DQ Mixed 56.4
105% 214 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 80%
Plextor Portable HDD PH2 500GB
450GB free, PID 0062
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 26 26 26 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
13.3% Very poor
Read 30.9
Write 20.8
Mixed 18.8
SusWrite 25.9
32% 24.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.4
49% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GS6MFR8C-PB 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
59.4% Above average
MC Read 22.2
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 18.5
60% 21 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 17.1
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 81.3
49% 81.3 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Latitude E6530 Builds (Compare 529 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Latitude E6530

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $248
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback