Today's hottest deals

MSI H110M GAMING (MS-7994)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive98.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMSI MS-7994
MotherboardMSI H110M GAMING (MS-7994)  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180625
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateDec 14 '21 at 00:47
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron G3930-$26
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
49.4% Average
Memory 67.8
1-Core 90.8
2-Core 157
61% 105 Pts
4-Core 182
8-Core 180
24% 181 Pts
64-Core 181
11% 181 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 610 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
MSI(1462 7994) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8682
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 3.1
Reflection 4.5
Parallax 3.8
2% 3.8 fps
Gravity 3.2
Splatting 6.2
4% 4.7 fps
Poor: 2% Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 120GB
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM01.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 296 286 367 349 376 375 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
98.8% Outstanding
Read 404
Write 350
Mixed 300
SusWrite 342
78% 349 MB/s
4K Read 39.9
4K Write 89.9
4K Mixed 38.2
157% 56 MB/s
DQ Read 327
DQ Write 311
DQ Mixed 205
185% 281 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 98.8%
Great: 94%
Toshiba MK3259GSXP 320GB-$50
296GB free
Firmware: GT001L
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 87 89 89 89 89 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
47.9% Average
Read 78.8
Write 87.4
Mixed 19
SusWrite 87.9
49% 68.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GB-$36
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73.8% Very good
MC Read 24.2
MC Write 29.5
MC Mixed 26
76% 26.6 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 30.4
SC Mixed 23.5
67% 23.3 GB/s
Latency 107
38% 107 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M GAMING (MS-7994) Builds (Compare 1,981 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI H110M GAMING (MS-7994)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $285
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback