Acer Nitro AN517-51

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.47% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive56.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAcer Nitro AN517-51  (all builds)
MotherboardCFL Superb_CFS
Memory15.7 GB free of 20 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201117
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 13 '21 at 21:04
Run Duration210 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
77.8% Very good
Memory 92.1
1-Core 122
2-Core 231
84% 148 Pts
4-Core 342
8-Core 632
58% 487 Pts
64-Core 639
40% 639 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Acer(1025 1333) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.6911
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
5.47% Terrible
Lighting 5.8
Reflection 40.2
Parallax 6.8
5% 17.6 fps
MRender 8.5
Gravity 6
Splatting 10.2
7% 8.23 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.47%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$104
364GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 75 75 81 79 80 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
56.4% Above average
Read 421
Write 84.8
Mixed 106
SusWrite 78.6
37% 173 MB/s
4K Read 16.1
4K Write 80.2
4K Mixed 22.1
95% 39.5 MB/s
DQ Read 189
DQ Write 80
DQ Mixed 107
86% 125 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 128%
ADATA USB Flash Drive 64GB
23GB free, PID cb22
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.3 9 9 9 9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
3.84% Terrible
Read 13.7
Write 4.5
Mixed 13.7
SusWrite 8.5
13% 10.1 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.84%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR26D4S9S1ME-4 0B89 APS-M4AGS0N26J-8MC 20GB
2667, 2667 MHz
4096, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
53.9% Above average
MC Read 21.7
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 15.2
52% 18.3 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 19.5
SC Mixed 16
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 63.9
63% 63.9 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Nitro AN517-51 Builds (Compare 2,512 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN517-51

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback