Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 109%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 101%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1200 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210616
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 13 '21 at 17:27
Run Duration252 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$115
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 88.8
1-Core 167
2-Core 325
104% 193 Pts
4-Core 635
8-Core 962
99% 799 Pts
64-Core 1,192
74% 1,192 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 104%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
Zotac(19DA 1451) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 497.09
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
104% Outstanding
Lighting 131
Reflection 145
Parallax 146
107% 141 fps
MRender 118
Gravity 137
Splatting 120
102% 125 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 104%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 1 1TB
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9.3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,995
Write 2,619
Mixed 1,398
517% 2,338 MB/s
4K Read 38.2
4K Write 77.9
4K Mixed 45.5
157% 53.9 MB/s
DQ Read 641
DQ Write 933
DQ Mixed 426
424% 667 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 454%
Kingston A400 120GB-$28
34GB free
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 212 5 12 55 55 16 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
62.6% Good
Read 387
Write 298
Mixed 303
SusWrite 59.2
58% 262 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 96.9
4K Mixed 26.4
132% 51.4 MB/s
DQ Read 163
DQ Write 29.4
DQ Mixed 17.4
33% 70 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 62.6%
Great: 85%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 8GB
4GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.6 2.1 3.5 3.1 1.8 3.2 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
8.84% Terrible
Read 21.7
Write 2
Mixed 1.8
SusWrite 2.5
6% 7 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
86% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.84%
Great: 13%
ST6000AS 0002-1N917X 6TB
147GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 35 34 35 36 35 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
42.7% Average
Read 36.2
Write 36.6
Mixed 34
SusWrite 35.4
49% 35.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 9.6
4K Mixed 0.6
351% 3.77 MB/s
DQ Read 0.3
DQ Write 10.1
DQ Mixed 0.8
372% 3.73 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$48
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
88.9% Excellent
MC Read 38.6
MC Write 22.7
MC Mixed 33.2
90% 31.5 GB/s
SC Read 29.2
SC Write 22.2
SC Mixed 33.8
81% 28.4 GB/s
Latency 68.7
58% 68.7 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS Builds (Compare 3,579 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 143%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $697
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback