MSI MPG X570 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C37)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 100%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics84.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive86.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory40GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 40GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C37
MotherboardMSI MPG X570 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C37)  (all builds)
Memory32.8 GB free of 40 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200703
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 10 '21 at 15:45
Run Duration517 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X-$493
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
87.9% Excellent
Memory 67.1
1-Core 151
2-Core 300
90% 173 Pts
4-Core 580
8-Core 1,166
103% 873 Pts
64-Core 2,957
183% 2,957 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6600-$330
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.12.1
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
84.1% Excellent
Lighting 88
Reflection 133
Parallax 168
72% 130 fps
MRender 187
Gravity 85.6
Splatting 129
108% 134 fps
Poor: 79%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 93%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 250GB-$40
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR020
SusWrite @10s intervals: 340 352 356 346 339 339 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
86.5% Excellent
Read 347
Write 336
Mixed 323
SusWrite 345
76% 338 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 65.3
4K Mixed 41.9
134% 45.9 MB/s
DQ Read 237
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 194
150% 205 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 123%
Corsair Force MP600 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$164
73GB free
Firmware: EGFM11.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1954
Write 2,340
Mixed 2,139
481% 2,144 MB/s
4K Read 44.4
4K Write 148
4K Mixed 68.4
234% 87.1 MB/s
DQ Read 906
DQ Write 801
DQ Mixed 865
646% 857 MB/s
Poor: 182% Great: 472%
WDS200T1X0E-00AFY0 2TB
21GB free
Firmware: 613000WD
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3021
Write 3,909
Mixed 2,929
737% 3,286 MB/s
4K Read 62.7
4K Write 164
4K Mixed 83.2
288% 103 MB/s
DQ Read 1,032
DQ Write 864
DQ Mixed 960
716% 952 MB/s
Poor: 280% Great: 578%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 510GB
171GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1676 1090 773 760 755 758 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 52% Great: 115%
HUS728T8TALN6L0 8TB
44GB free
Firmware: V8EMT430
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 124 119 118 122 118 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
20.1% Poor
Read 250
Write 243
Mixed 99.6
SusWrite 121
40% 178 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 8.1
4K Mixed 1.5
9% 3.77 MB/s
DQ Read 0.6
DQ Write 8.9
DQ Mixed 1.2
2% 3.57 MB/s
Hitachi HUS728T8TALN6L0 8TB
52GB free
Firmware: V8EMT430
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 116 118 118 116 119 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
97.8% Outstanding
Read 222
Write 226
Mixed 104
SusWrite 118
123% 167 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 6.5
4K Mixed 1.7
372% 3.23 MB/s
Hitachi HUH721010ALN600 10TB
83GB free
Firmware: LHGNT290
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 115 111 109 109 114 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Read 166
Write 182
Mixed 98
SusWrite 112
103% 140 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 6.3
4K Mixed 1.1
285% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 138%
Hitachi HUH721010ALN600 10TB
90GB free
Firmware: LHGNT290
SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 204 206 206 195 206 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 166
Write 172
Mixed 93.1
SusWrite 204
116% 159 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 1.3
282% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 106%
Great: 138%
Toshiba MK7559GSXP 750GB-$118
89GB free
Firmware: GN003J
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 93 82 93 90 93 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
49.4% Average
Read 82.3
Write 79.3
Mixed 20.1
SusWrite 89.9
49% 67.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 56%
Seagate Expansion Desk 10TB
89GB free
Firmware: 0915
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 107 112 115 113 113 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 20% Great: 107%
Usb3.0 Super Speed 128GB
18GB free
Firmware: 0214
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 76 72 73 74 76 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 8% Great: 25%
Generic Flash Disk 1TB
977GB free, PID 7777
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 8.4 9 8.5 8 8.2 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
5.6% Terrible
Read 17.9
Write 8
Mixed 16.9
SusWrite 8.9
17% 12.9 MB/s
4K Read 4.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
17% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 5.6%
Great: 8%
SAMSUNG HD204UI 2TB
10GB free, PID 0475
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 28 29 29 28 29 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
13.1% Very poor
Read 27.7
Write 28.1
Mixed 32.8
SusWrite 28.6
41% 29.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.9
63% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.1%
Great: 20%
Intenso Speed Line 256GB
36GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 12 7 19 19 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
22.1% Poor
Read 99.6
Write 27.2
Mixed 78.9
SusWrite 17.2
66% 55.7 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1.5
99% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 22.1%
Great: 22%
WD Elements 25A3 10TB
90GB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 153 157 157 158 159 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Read 153
Write 158
Mixed 116
SusWrite 158
199% 146 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 8.5
4K Mixed 0.9
332% 4.27 MB/s
DQ Read 0.5
DQ Write 5.7
DQ Mixed 1.2
236% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLS8G4D240FSB.16FBD CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 F4-3200C16-16GIS CMK16GX4M2B3200C16 40GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 16384, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
74.9% Very good
MC Read 29.1
MC Write 26.7
MC Mixed 26.9
79% 27.6 GB/s
SC Read 21
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 24.4
60% 21.1 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MPG X570 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C37) Builds (Compare 10,810 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG X570 GAMING EDGE WIFI (MS-7C37) - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $1,027
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback