Gigabyte GA-Z390 AORUS ELITE-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 110% UFO	Desktop 97% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 111% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	117% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	231% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS ELITE
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z390 AORUS ELITE-CF (all builds)
Memory	16.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200916
Uptime	1.2 Days
Run Date	Dec 10 '21 at 04:06
Run Duration	173 Seconds
Run User	ISR-User
Background CPU	14%

Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$410 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	95.5% Outstanding	Memory 88.5 1-Core 144 2-Core 286 94% 173 Pts	4-Core 550 8-Core 996 93% 773 Pts	64-Core 1,506 93% 1,506 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 95.5% Great: 104%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210 663,603 User benchmarks, average bench 115% Asus(1043 8728) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 496.76 Performing below potential (66^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	117% Outstanding	Lighting 151 Reflection 149 Parallax 150 123% 150 fps	MRender 192 Gravity 138 Splatting 117 118% 149 fps
Poor: 105% ↑ This bench: 117% Great: 123%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158 331,647 User benchmarks, average bench 297% 208GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 923 478 312 293 471 475 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	231% Outstanding	Read 2,579 Write 1,488 Mixed 1,749 SusWrite 492 350% 1,577 MB/s	4K Read 56.1 4K Write 86.9 4K Mixed 64.8 214% 69.3 MB/s	DQ Read 974 DQ Write 407 DQ Mixed 499 420% 627 MB/s
Poor: 214% ↑ This bench: 231% Great: 372%
WDC WD181KRYZ-01AGBB0 18TB 301 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 76GB free Firmware: 01.01H01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 154 169 183 146 138 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	22.7% Poor	Read 110 Write 115 Mixed 108 SusWrite 150 27% 121 MB/s	4K Read 17.5 4K Write 14 4K Mixed 0.1 34% 10.5 MB/s	DQ Read 1 DQ Write 4.2 DQ Mixed 3.6 2% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 22.7% Great: 39%
Asmt ASM1156-PM 8TB 166 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 2.5TB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 15 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	14.3% Very poor	Read 32.9 Write 36.1 Mixed 31.3 SusWrite 14.4 21% 28.7 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 7.1 4K Mixed 0.7 259% 3 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 14.3% Great: 103%
StoreJet Transcend 8TB 61 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 5TB free, PID 5106 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 13 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	32% Below average	Read 32.6 Write 33.9 Mixed 32.4 SusWrite 13.6 38% 28.1 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 7.8 4K Mixed 0.9 301% 3.33 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 32% Great: 92%
WD My Book Duo 25F6 20TB 307 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 4.5TB free, PID 25f6 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	19.1% Very poor	Read 35.9 Write 36 Mixed 33.8 SusWrite 13.2 39% 29.7 MB/s	4K Read 6.5 4K Write 3.1 4K Mixed 0.5 146% 3.37 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 19.1% Great: 141%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMW64GX4M4C3200C16 2x16GB 461 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	48.1% Average	MC Read 16.1 MC Write 17.7 MC Mixed 13.4 45% 15.7 GB/s	SC Read 14.7 SC Write 18.9 SC Mixed 18.6 50% 17.4 GB/s	Latency 69.1 58% 69.1 ns
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 48.1% Great: 110%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS ELITE-CF Builds (Compare 6,771 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 144%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 132%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z390 AORUS ELITE-CF

CPU
Core i7-9700KIntel $295Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	1,856x
Core i9-9900KIntel $410Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	1,711x
Core i5-9600KIntel $155Bench 93%, 321,194 samples	1,081x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	511x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	483x
RTX 3080Nvidia $625Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	453x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	375x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	307x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	226x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	207x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	192x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	158x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $835

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16