HP 245 G5 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 245 G5 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8305
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200511
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 09 '21 at 18:00
Run Duration270 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD PRO A4-3350B APU R4 Graphics
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
25.6% Poor
Memory 31.6
1-Core 32.4
2-Core 66.4
25% 43.5 Pts
4-Core 114
8-Core 114
15% 114 Pts
64-Core 112
7% 112 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 25.6%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R4
HP(103C 8305) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.93% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 3.5
2% 2.77 fps
MRender 1.8
Gravity 2.6
Splatting 3.3
2% 2.57 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.93%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDSC2BX400G4R 400GB
200GB free (System drive)
Firmware: G201DL2D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 343 275 333 331 322 329 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
70.7% Very good
Read 415
Write 354
Mixed 276
SusWrite 322
77% 342 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 40.6
4K Mixed 25.1
88% 29.6 MB/s
DQ Read 174
DQ Write 145
DQ Mixed 168
123% 162 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 103%
Intel SSDSC2BX400G4R 400GB
38GB free
Firmware: G201DL2D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 352 277 341 337 330 334 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
73.2% Very good
Read 442
Write 360
Mixed 276
SusWrite 328
79% 352 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 42.5
4K Mixed 25.8
91% 30.5 MB/s
DQ Read 177
DQ Write 159
DQ Mixed 173
128% 170 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16KTF1G64HZ-1G6N1 Hynix HMT41GS6AFR8A-PB 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
14.8% Very poor
MC Read 6.4
MC Write 4.2
MC Mixed 4.9
15% 5.17 GB/s
SC Read 3.9
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 4
11% 4 GB/s
Latency 245
16% 245 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 245 G5 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 122 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP 245 G5 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 20% - Very poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $120
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback