HP Compaq Pro 6300 SFF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics8.11% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq Pro 6300 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 339A
Memory3.2 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120507
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 08 '21 at 12:01
Run Duration333 Seconds
Run User HRV-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3220-$60
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
60.8% Good
Memory 83.6
1-Core 86.4
2-Core 142
64% 104 Pts
4-Core 223
8-Core 222
30% 223 Pts
64-Core 223
14% 223 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 740
Gainward(10B0 0FC8) 2GB
CLim: 1058 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 382.05
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
8.11% Terrible
Lighting 8.8
Reflection 11.9
Parallax 12.8
7% 11.2 fps
MRender 13.8
Gravity 12.4
Splatting 10.8
10% 12.3 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.11%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
435GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FJK2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 44 53 51 48 66 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
41.2% Average
Read 92.7
Write 97.7
Mixed 47.9
SusWrite 50.6
53% 72.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
123% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 88%
WD Black 500GB (2008)-$95
168GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 47 55 54 52 61 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
35.3% Below average
Read 69.8
Write 47.7
Mixed 55.9
SusWrite 52.7
42% 56.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 69%
FUJITSU MHV2100BH PL 100GB
3GB free, PID 2509
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 19 19 19 18 19 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
11.7% Very poor
Read 31
Write 23.3
Mixed 20.3
SusWrite 18.6
30% 23.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
52% 0.63 MB/s
Hitachi HDP725050GLA360 500GB
118GB free, PID 0c25
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 20 20 19 19 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
13.7% Very poor
Read 28.3
Write 22.4
Mixed 22
SusWrite 19.4
30% 23 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
87% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.7%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5773DH0-CH9 04CD F3-10666CL9-2GBNS M378B5773DH0-CH9 6GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
38.2% Below average
MC Read 13.2
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 11.5
37% 12.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 9.9
32% 11.1 GB/s
Latency 74.1
54% 74.1 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq Pro 6300 SFF Builds (Compare 3,146 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Pro 6300 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback