MSI Z370 GAMING M5 (MS-7B58)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 101%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics99.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B58
MotherboardMSI Z370 GAMING M5 (MS-7B58)  (all builds)
Memory26.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190404
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateDec 08 '21 at 00:51
Run Duration374 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900KF-$269
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
98.1% Outstanding
Memory 91
1-Core 146
2-Core 288
96% 175 Pts
4-Core 564
8-Core 1,003
94% 784 Pts
64-Core 1584
98% 1584 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 98.1%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
99.3% Outstanding
Lighting 124
Reflection 134
Parallax 131
101% 130 fps
MRender 112
Gravity 128
Splatting 112
96% 117 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 99.3%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
123GB free
Firmware: 4B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,589
Write 2,393
Mixed 2,376
548% 2,452 MB/s
4K Read 75.2
4K Write 176
4K Mixed 102
338% 118 MB/s
DQ Read 1,480
DQ Write 1,185
DQ Mixed 1,298
981% 1,321 MB/s
Poor: 188% Great: 410%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$159
297GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2440 1897 1295 1290 1289 1292 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
350% Outstanding
Read 2,522
Write 2,401
Mixed 1,677
SusWrite 1,584
459% 2,046 MB/s
4K Read 64.6
4K Write 164
4K Mixed 89
299% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 1,471
DQ Write 1,204
DQ Mixed 1,289
979% 1,322 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 350%
Great: 372%
Sandisk S3512G 512GB
90GB free
Firmware: X6104000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 248 174 157 195 159 177 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
97.4% Outstanding
Read 436
Write 341
Mixed 139
SusWrite 185
61% 275 MB/s
4K Read 41.1
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 41
176% 65.7 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 82.5
135% 262 MB/s
Poor: 70%
This bench: 97.4%
Great: 119%
Spcc Solid State Disk 256GB
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM91.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 441 413 430 185 242 111 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 5% Great: 62%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
718GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 124 124 123 124 122 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
69.5% Good
Read 119
Write 118
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 124
69% 96.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
113% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 75%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$58
332GB free
Firmware: 05.03D06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 65 65 65 65 65 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
37% Below average
Read 63.5
Write 66.2
Mixed 57.2
SusWrite 64.7
47% 62.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
174% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 37%
Great: 76%
Samsung Flash Drive FIT 257GB
59GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.2 39 107 105 107 103 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 15% Great: 126%
SABRENT DISK01 256GB
103GB free, PID 1561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 90 90 92 92 91 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
130% Outstanding
Read 210
Write 246
Mixed 177
SusWrite 90.8
241% 181 MB/s
4K Read 15.8
4K Write 24.8
4K Mixed 16.3
1,457% 19 MB/s
DQ Read 14.7
DQ Write 29.2
DQ Mixed 16.6
1,612% 20.2 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 130%
Great: 168%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 3TB
2.5TB free, PID a0a1
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 155 154 153 153 153 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
64.5% Good
Read 187
Write 142
Mixed 86.9
SusWrite 152
184% 142 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
75% 1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 73%
WD My Passport 2627 5TB
4.5TB free, PID 2627
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 115 114 115 113 113 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
60.9% Good
Read 126
Write 108
Mixed 81.6
SusWrite 114
143% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 5.7
4K Mixed 0.8
227% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 65%
SABRENT DISK02 750GB
572GB free, PID 1561
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 90 91 92 92 91 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
39.1% Below average
Read 97.7
Write 91.6
Mixed 36.5
SusWrite 91.3
104% 79.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
77% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2C3000C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.4% Very good
MC Read 25.8
MC Write 27.7
MC Mixed 21.9
72% 25.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 29.3
SC Mixed 23.5
67% 23.5 GB/s
Latency 65.8
61% 65.8 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z370 GAMING M5 (MS-7B58) Builds (Compare 2,207 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI Z370 GAMING M5 (MS-7B58) - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $1,006
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback