Dell OptiPlex 9010

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics41% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive63.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemDell OptiPlex 9010
MotherboardDell OptiPlex 9010  (all builds)
Memory8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180628
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 07 '21 at 07:12
Run Duration221 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 24%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
60% Above average
Memory 73.2
1-Core 90.4
2-Core 177
65% 114 Pts
4-Core 270
8-Core 278
36% 274 Pts
64-Core 288
18% 288 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 60%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41% Average
Lighting 53.1
Reflection 54.4
Parallax 47.6
43% 51.7 fps
MRender 40.5
Gravity 49.4
Splatting 44.4
37% 44.8 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 41%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN128HCHP-000H1 128GB
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02H0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 146 148 148 148 149 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
63.2% Good
Read 356
Write 154
Mixed 170
SusWrite 147
46% 207 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 53
4K Mixed 24.3
91% 32.8 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 153
DQ Mixed 190
161% 242 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 87%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$32
894GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 152 181 178 181 187 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
94.6% Outstanding
Read 158
Write 169
Mixed 39.4
SusWrite 172
97% 135 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
147% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 94.6%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-012.A00LF Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 99U5471-012.A00LF Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
42.5% Average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 13.9
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 11.5
SC Mixed 11.9
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 94.2
42% 94.2 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OptiPlex 9010 Builds (Compare 3,947 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 9010

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback