Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive	29.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E7- 4870-$3,450 40 User benchmarks, average bench 50% None, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	51.7% Above average	Memory 61 1-Core 36.6 2-Core 114 42% 70.6 Pts	4-Core 228 8-Core 484 42% 356 Pts	64-Core 480 30% 480 Pts
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 51.7% Great: 65%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Virtual HD 1TB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 998GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 35 33 28 35 40 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	29.1% Poor	Read 378 Write 333 Mixed 319 SusWrite 36.3 60% 267 MB/s	4K Read 8.4 4K Write 8.3 4K Mixed 8.4 28% 8.37 MB/s	DQ Read 71.7 DQ Write 66.2 DQ Mixed 76.1 55% 71.3 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 29.1% Great: 80%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 275GB 69 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 256GB free Firmware: 1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 96 87 84 99 114 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 6% Great: 92%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 275GB 69 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 256GB free Firmware: 1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 94 88 84 98 115 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 6% Great: 92%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 275GB 69 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 256GB free Firmware: 1.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 97 90 83 100 114 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 6% Great: 92%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8GB 82,857 User benchmarks, average bench 34% null MHz 3968, 4224 MB Performing below potential (33^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	27.7% Poor	MC Read 13.8 MC Write 7.5 MC Mixed 10.4 30% 10.6 GB/s	SC Read 2.8 SC Write 3.4 SC Mixed 3.6 9% 3.27 GB/s	Latency 125 32% 125 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 27.7% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,145x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,058x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	827x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	458x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	432x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325