ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics	6.39% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	45.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

8 years ago, 8 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3 (all builds)
Memory	6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20130423
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 10 '15 at 09:54
Run Duration	474 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 955-$83 41,403 User benchmarks, average bench 51% Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 58.2 2-Core 116 39% 86.8 Pts	4-Core 231 8-Core 232 31% 231 Pts	64-Core 232 14% 232 Pts
Poor: 38% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5670 18,196 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Asus(1043 0356) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0 Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	6.39% Terrible	Lighting 7.73 Reflection 8.81 Parallax 6.09 6% 7.54 fps	MRender 9.05 Gravity 5.3 Splatting 9.3 7% 7.88 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.39% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra Plus 128GB-$75 16,709 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 64GB free (System drive) Firmware: X230 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 253 100 2340 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1153 (A6) Unknown 100 100 1 (A7) Unknown 100 100 21 (A8) Unknown 100 100 152 (A9) Unknown 100 100 127 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 61 (AE) Unknown 100 100 37 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 69 37 158914838559 (D4) Unknown 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 515 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 8077 (F1) Unknown 253 253 4103 (F2) Unknown 253 253 5094 (F3) Unknown 100 100 0	45.3% Average	Read 241 Write 234 Mixed 233 53% 236 MB/s	4K Read 20.4 4K Write 45.8 4K Mixed 10.9 69% 25.7 MB/s	DQ Read 21.4 DQ Write 35.5 DQ Mixed 11 13% 22.6 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 45.3% Great: 91%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 496GB free Firmware: JC4B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 109 99 24955370 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 453 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 66 60 4667100 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1434 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 349 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 98 262149 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 45 538312736 (C2) HDA temperature 32 55 81604378656 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 38 24 24955370 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -123871151781621 (F1) Unknown 100 253 2020178606 (F2) Unknown 100 253 3016613920	53.3% Above average	Read 95.6 Write 90.2 Mixed 101 72% 95.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.56 4K Write 1.59 4K Mixed 0.27 83% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 53.3% Great: 68%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 500GB-$80 27,325 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 228GB free Firmware: SD15 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 112 99 49843905 (03) Spinup time 94 91 0 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 3043 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 79 60 4381775722 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 4801 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 11 (0C) Power cycle count 98 37 2130 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 97 12885229592 (BD) vendor-specific 96 96 4 (BE) vendor-specific 67 48 555024417 (C2) HDA temperature 33 52 60129542177 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 40 31 49843905 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 49	36.5% Below average	Read 67.3 Write 59.9 Mixed 59.8 47% 62.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.59 4K Write 1.27 4K Mixed 0.27 79% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 36.5% Great: 59%
Generic- SD/MMC 32GB 927 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 28GB free, PID null Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	9.23% Terrible	Read 17.1 Write 14.3 Mixed 14.1 19% 15.2 MB/s	4K Read 3.07 4K Write 0.95 4K Mixed 0.67 66% 1.56 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 9.23% Great: 17%
USB DISK 2.0 2GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 1GB free, PID 9917 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	3.24% Terrible	Read 12.5 Write 2.81 Mixed 3.82 6% 6.39 MB/s	4K Read 3.37 4K Write 0.006 4K Mixed 0.006 13% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.24% Great: 4%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical GA-78LMT-USB3 Builds (Compare 1,068 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-78LMT-USB3 - $120

CPU
FX-6300AMD $90Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	272x
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	185x
FX-8320AMD $203Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	135x

GPU
Radeon 3000 GraphicsATIBench 1%, 21,841 samples	64x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	63x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	49x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	28x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	26x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $36Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	23x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	201x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	187x
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	176x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $238

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback