To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	6.12% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	To Be Filled By O.E.M. (all builds)
Memory	1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150102
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 29 '21 at 09:01
Run Duration	202 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	22%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 870-$100 37,228 User benchmarks, average bench 66% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	65.9% Good	Memory 93.2 1-Core 77.5 2-Core 150 66% 107 Pts	4-Core 211 8-Core 343 34% 277 Pts	64-Core 354 22% 354 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 65.9% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 3870 554 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Asus(1043 022A) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	6.12% Terrible	Lighting 7.6 Reflection 11.2 Parallax 2.4 6% 7.07 fps	MRender 7.8 Gravity 3.5 Splatting 9.7 6% 7 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 6.12% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung HD321KJ 320GB-$42 12,070 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 275GB free (System drive) Firmware: CP100-12 SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 33 26 19 55 42 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	28.2% Poor	Read 63.8 Write 61.3 Mixed 33.5 SusWrite 34.3 35% 48.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.8 126% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 28.2% Great: 43%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$32 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 816GB free Firmware: JC4B SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 96 91 88 111 102 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	60.7% Good	Read 114 Write 101 Mixed 57.8 SusWrite 97.4 68% 92.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.9 152% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 60.7% Great: 68%
USB2.0 Flash Disk 4GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 2GB free, PID 1167 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 4.8 4.8 4.6 4.8 4.8 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	4.19% Terrible	Read 14.2 Write 2.5 Mixed 0.8 SusWrite 4.7 6% 5.55 MB/s	4K Read 4.7 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 17% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.19% Great: 5%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x4GB 154,807 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM SDRAM Performing below potential (37^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	21.6% Poor	MC Read 7.1 MC Write 5.6 MC Mixed 5 17% 5.9 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 8 SC Mixed 6.4 21% 7.2 GB/s	Latency 61.7 65% 61.7 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 21.6% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,607 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	721x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	281x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	268x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	619x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	461x
G41 Express ChipsetIntelBench 0%, 33,874 samples	361x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	137x
256GB 256GBSSDBench 77%, 9,229 samples	103x
128GB 128GBSSDBench 65%, 7,332 samples	90x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	500x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	307x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	227x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16