Today's hottest deals

Alienware 14

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics9.45% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
SystemAlienware 14  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 07MJ2Y
Memory2.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140423
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 29 '17 at 23:27
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4700MQ-$209
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
78.5% Very good
Memory 91.9
1-Core 99.5
2-Core 193
75% 128 Pts
4-Core 353
8-Core 508
54% 430 Pts
64-Core 508
31% 508 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 750M
Dell(1028 05A9) 1GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 22.21.13.8528
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
9.45% Terrible
Lighting 10.6
Reflection 9.65
Parallax 12.1
9% 10.8 fps
MRender 13.9
Gravity 12.5
Splatting 13.8
11% 13.4 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.45%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZMPA064HMDR-000H1 64GB
40GB free
Firmware: AXM18H1Q Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 24% Great: 39%
WD Black 2.5" 750GB (2013)-$64
495GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 28% Great: 71%
Apricorn 80GB
30GB free, PID 0301
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
12.1% Very poor
Read 22.6
Write 27.8
Mixed 19
30% 23.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.25
4K Write 0.87
4K Mixed 0.23
38% 0.45 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173BH0-YK0 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
58.6% Above average
MC Read 21.9
MC Write 21.3
MC Mixed 17.5
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 17.7
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 64.3
62% 64.3 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 14 Builds (Compare 634 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Alienware 14

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $244
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback