Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ULTRA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics16.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ULTRA  (all builds)
Memory24.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210122
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 28 '21 at 14:32
Run Duration217 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$325
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
93% Outstanding
Memory 79.9
1-Core 143
2-Core 287
92% 170 Pts
4-Core 568
8-Core 1,075
98% 822 Pts
64-Core 2,128
132% 2,128 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 93%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100 Graphics
AMD(1002 0B0D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1086 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.Q3
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
16.4% Very poor
Lighting 15.7
Reflection 40.9
Parallax 20.7
13% 25.8 fps
MRender 39.2
Gravity 19
Splatting 28.1
23% 28.8 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.4%
Great: 32%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$70
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,591
Write 1941
Mixed 1,593
452% 2,042 MB/s
4K Read 66.2
4K Write 177
4K Mixed 86.9
305% 110 MB/s
DQ Read 1,003
DQ Write 982
DQ Mixed 1,123
808% 1,036 MB/s
Poor: 152% Great: 302%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
172GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 969 891 887 888 891 890 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
258% Outstanding
Read 1,407
Write 1,093
Mixed 1,145
SusWrite 902
255% 1,137 MB/s
4K Read 69.9
4K Write 153
4K Mixed 89.6
302% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 1,340
DQ Write 1,036
DQ Mixed 1,164
878% 1,180 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 258%
Great: 346%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$34
375GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 133 134 135 136 138 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
74.8% Very good
Read 126
Write 120
Mixed 71.2
SusWrite 134
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
206% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS16G4D32AESE.M16FE 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
109% Outstanding
MC Read 44.4
MC Write 38.9
MC Mixed 39.2
117% 40.8 GB/s
SC Read 26.5
SC Write 23.3
SC Mixed 35.3
81% 28.4 GB/s
Latency 80.7
50% 80.7 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 109%
Great: 129%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS ULTRA Builds (Compare 3,106 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ULTRA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $1,078
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback