Fujitsu ESPRIMO E700

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.46% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemFujitsu ESPRIMO E700  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3061-A1
Memory1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110907
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateAug 27 '17 at 15:36
Run Duration330 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-2120-$73
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
58.5% Above average
Memory 82.9
1-Core 52.1
2-Core 98.9
51% 78 Pts
4-Core 197
8-Core 214
27% 205 Pts
64-Core 221
14% 221 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 430
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 350 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 384.94
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
3.46% Terrible
Lighting 4.27
Reflection 4.92
Parallax 3.41
4% 4.2 fps
MRender 5.71
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 3.09
3% 4.37 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.46%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST500NM0011 500GB-$79
374GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Read 136
Write 124
Mixed 73.5
82% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.89
4K Write 2.32
4K Mixed 0.63
150% 1.28 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 84%
WDC WD20 EARS-00MVWB0 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
15.9% Very poor
Read 31
Write 25.5
Mixed 17.6
30% 24.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.39
4K Write 1.87
4K Mixed 0.19
71% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 15.9%
Great: 20%
HUA72101 0KLA330 1TB
927GB free, PID 0c25
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
7.41% Terrible
Read 28.9
Write 6.85
Mixed 10.2
16% 15.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.71
4K Write 0.51
4K Mixed 0.32
31% 0.52 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.41%
Great: 8%
ST1000DL 002-9TT153 1TB
770GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
22.8% Poor
Read 31.1
Write 26.5
Mixed 4.93
24% 20.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 4.04
4K Mixed 0.38
152% 1.61 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 22.8%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5773CH0-CK0 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
47.8% Average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 15.6
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 12.1
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 75.3
53% 75.3 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ESPRIMO E700 Builds (Compare 107 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu ESPRIMO E700

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $360
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback