HP EliteDesk 800 G4 DM 65W

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.61% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive173% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G4 DM 65W  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 845A
Memory18.4 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201228
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 17 '21 at 23:02
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$186
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
65.7% Good
Memory 82.8
1-Core 105
2-Core 158
69% 115 Pts
4-Core 270
8-Core 348
40% 309 Pts
64-Core 427
26% 427 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
HP(103C 845A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
4.61% Terrible
Lighting 4.9
Reflection 6.9
Parallax 7.2
4% 6.33 fps
MRender 6
Gravity 5.6
Splatting 8.9
6% 6.83 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.61%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HAHQ-000H1 256GB
186GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXD70H1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 921 242 242 241 257 264 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
173% Outstanding
Read 1,588
Write 1,333
Mixed 1,023
SusWrite 361
240% 1,076 MB/s
4K Read 46.5
4K Write 99.9
4K Mixed 57
196% 67.8 MB/s
DQ Read 660
DQ Write 551
DQ Mixed 710
504% 641 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 173%
Great: 235%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CTD Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 24GB
2667, 2400 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
39.1% Below average
MC Read 14
MC Write 13.6
MC Mixed 11.7
37% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 13.1
SC Mixed 11.5
34% 11.8 GB/s
Latency 75.5
53% 75.5 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 800 G4 DM 65W Builds (Compare 219 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G4 DM 65W

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $139
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback