Today's hottest deals

Asus ROG MAXIMUS XI CODE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 109%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 187%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 108%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics170% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive246% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG MAXIMUS XI CODE  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210708
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 16 '21 at 22:41
Run Duration289 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900KS
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 5.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Memory 98
1-Core 163
2-Core 324
106% 195 Pts
4-Core 636
8-Core 1,228
111% 932 Pts
64-Core 1,709
106% 1,709 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 108%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
CLim: 2220 MHz, MLim: 3661 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 496.49
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
170% Outstanding
Lighting 230
Reflection 214
Parallax 249
187% 231 fps
MRender 279
Gravity 233
Splatting 191
187% 234 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 170%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$105
155GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 581 334 332 330 332 335 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
246% Outstanding
Read 2,430
Write 1,473
Mixed 1,278
SusWrite 374
307% 1,389 MB/s
4K Read 60.6
4K Write 142
4K Mixed 80
269% 94 MB/s
DQ Read 979
DQ Write 924
DQ Mixed 1,011
743% 971 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 246%
Great: 280%
WD Green SATA M.2 240GB-$76
222GB free
Firmware: Z3311000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 266 309 134 139 144 139 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
59.2% Above average
Read 475
Write 428
Mixed 386
SusWrite 189
83% 369 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 21.3
4K Mixed 13.3
57% 17.8 MB/s
DQ Read 215
DQ Write 309
DQ Mixed 33
89% 186 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 68%
Liteon LCH-256V2S 256GB
477GB free
Firmware: WC87901
SusWrite @10s intervals: 540 525 527 528 527 526 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 57% Great: 98%
Kingston SA400S37960G 960GB
538GB free
Firmware: S3402101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 265 380 426 438 431 403 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
68.8% Good
Read 221
Write 14
Mixed 23
SusWrite 390
36% 162 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 75.8
4K Mixed 12.7
88% 36.5 MB/s
DQ Read 153
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 33.1
85% 172 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 102%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
45GB free
Firmware: 521ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 80 83 84 81 84 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
52.5% Above average
Read 129
Write 103
Mixed 123
SusWrite 81.6
24% 109 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 85.2
4K Mixed 32.8
124% 47.4 MB/s
DQ Read 122
DQ Write 71.1
DQ Mixed 96.5
72% 96.5 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 73%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$33
450GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 148 147 146 149 149 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
85.2% Excellent
Read 149
Write 136
Mixed 103
SusWrite 148
99% 134 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
209% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 109%
WD 5000AVV External 500GB
379GB free, PID 1100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 41 43 42 43 43 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
22.5% Poor
Read 40.7
Write 41
Mixed 28.5
SusWrite 41.8
52% 38 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.7
108% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 22.5%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 4000 C18 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4133 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
111% Outstanding
MC Read 40
MC Write 45.8
MC Mixed 31.3
112% 39 GB/s
SC Read 23.5
SC Write 50.8
SC Mixed 32.8
102% 35.7 GB/s
Latency 46.2
87% 46.2 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 111%
Great: 130%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG MAXIMUS XI CODE Builds (Compare 1,064 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 152%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 151%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG MAXIMUS XI CODE - $759

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $1,789
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback