Lenovo 30B6S05A00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics32.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive79.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 30B6S05A00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 1030
Memory60.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160515
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 12 '21 at 14:18
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v4
LGA2011-3 SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 48 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
60.2% Good
Memory 59.2
1-Core 87.4
2-Core 178
60% 108 Pts
4-Core 328
8-Core 645
58% 487 Pts
64-Core 2,583
160% 2,583 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M4000
Nvidia(10DE 1153) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 772 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 472.47
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
32.5% Below average
Lighting 38.9
Reflection 41.8
Parallax 37.4
32% 39.4 fps
MRender 50.4
Gravity 36.6
Splatting 39.5
34% 42.2 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDDAK1T0MBF 1TB
900GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LN01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 388 387 383 368 377 378 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
79.3% Very good
Read 348
Write 385
Mixed 280
SusWrite 380
79% 348 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 67.7
4K Mixed 29.5
107% 39.8 MB/s
DQ Read 99
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 136
124% 182 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 101%
Crucial MTFDDAK1T0MBF 1TB
954GB free
Firmware: LN01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 391 391 384 382 379 379 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Read 338
Write 389
Mixed 277
SusWrite 384
78% 347 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 70.1
4K Mixed 32.5
114% 41.9 MB/s
DQ Read 102
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 137
125% 183 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA41GR7AFR8N-UH 8x8GB
8 of 12 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
129% Outstanding
MC Read 60.3
MC Write 50.8
MC Mixed 48.3
152% 53.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 16.6
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 130
31% 130 ns
Poor: 86%
This bench: 129%
Great: 129%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 30B6S05A00 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

System: Lenovo 30B6S05A00

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback