Asrock FM2A68M-DG3+

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 37% Jet ski	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	27.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	52.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock FM2A68M-DG3+ (all builds)
Memory	11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160112
Uptime	15.6 Days
Run Date	Nov 11 '21 at 11:01
Run Duration	199 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	100%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon X4 845-$50 6,391 User benchmarks, average bench 45% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	20.7% Poor	Memory 19.3 1-Core 50.1 2-Core 87.3 28% 52.2 Pts	4-Core 118 8-Core 182 18% 150 Pts	64-Core 189 12% 189 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 20.7% Great: 54%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Nvidia(10DE 11BF) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	27.8% Poor	Lighting 34.8 Reflection 38.7 Parallax 37.3 28% 36.9 fps	MRender 37.5 Gravity 37.4 Splatting 25.8 27% 33.6 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 27.8% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Gigabyte SSD 120GB-$30 13,685 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 27GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 97 50 43 29 40 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	52.1% Above average	Read 365 Write 303 Mixed 269 SusWrite 56.7 55% 248 MB/s	4K Read 22.7 4K Write 47.2 4K Mixed 19.7 85% 29.9 MB/s	DQ Read 217 DQ Write 165 DQ Mixed 155 126% 179 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 52.1% Great: 86%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$26 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 41GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 23 50 82 119 113 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	25.1% Poor	Read 17.2 Write 54.3 Mixed 20.3 SusWrite 70.1 30% 40.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.2 58% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 25.1% Great: 107%
SAMSUNG HD642JJ 640GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 118GB free, PID 55aa Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 22 23 25 26 24 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	11.5% Very poor	Read 17.3 Write 8.2 Mixed 18 SusWrite 22.6 22% 16.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 69% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 11.5% Great: 49%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT102464BD160B.C16 Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G 16GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	29.7% Poor	MC Read 13.3 MC Write 7.7 MC Mixed 13.8 33% 11.6 GB/s	SC Read 4.9 SC Write 5.4 SC Mixed 6.6 16% 5.63 GB/s	Latency 326 12% 326 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 29.7% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical FM2A68M-DG3+ Builds (Compare 547 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 46%

Yacht

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A68M-DG3+

CPU
A8-7680 Radeon R7, 10 Compute Cores 4C+6GAMDBench 43%, 2,565 samples	62x
A8-7650K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 44%, 15,487 samples	49x
A6-7480 Radeon R5, 8 Compute Cores 2C+6GAMDBench 34%, 2,203 samples	40x

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 37,078 samples	37x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples	37x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	27x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	23x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	13x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	12x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	22x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	19x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	15x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $229	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397