Fujitsu ESPRIMO P710

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics14% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemFujitsu ESPRIMO P710  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3161-A1
Memory25.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141201
Uptime25 Days
Run DateNov 10 '21 at 09:44
Run Duration290 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
70% Very good
Memory 77.8
1-Core 98.3
2-Core 192
70% 123 Pts
4-Core 358
8-Core 372
48% 365 Pts
64-Core 372
23% 372 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 70%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Asus(1043 85F5) 2GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 461.40
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
14% Very poor
Lighting 16.9
Reflection 19.2
Parallax 15.4
14% 17.2 fps
MRender 15
Gravity 19.8
Splatting 17.7
14% 17.5 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB-$21
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 26 29 12 13 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
22.4% Poor
Read 58.4
Write 17.2
Mixed 31
SusWrite 19.6
24% 31.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.2
42% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 22.4%
Great: 61%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$24
84GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 74 80 64 69 84 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
40% Below average
Read 65.6
Write 46.3
Mixed 34.5
SusWrite 73.6
40% 55 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
116% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 40%
Great: 69%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$24
163GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 88 94 75 81 96 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
53.5% Above average
Read 100
Write 94.5
Mixed 57.2
SusWrite 86.1
62% 84.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
118% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 69%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$30
62GB free
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 112 119 96 104 122 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
53.5% Above average
Read 76.6
Write 72.7
Mixed 51.9
SusWrite 110
57% 77.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 70%
WD WD2500JD-00HBB0 250GB-$140
12GB free
Firmware: 08.02D08
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.9 9.6 10 8.7 9 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
4.5% Terrible
Read 6
Write 10.5
Mixed 7.5
SusWrite 9.5
6% 8.38 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.3
51% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 4.5%
Great: 33%
ST350063 0A 500GB
47GB free, PID 0275
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 12 9.7 10 12 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
9.12% Terrible
Read 21.9
Write 12
Mixed 14.7
SusWrite 11.1
19% 14.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
63% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.12%
Great: 18%
DELL RD1000 1TB
604GB free, PID 1120
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.2 9.9 10 8.6 9.3 11 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
9.61% Terrible
Read 19.4
Write 15.1
Mixed 13.5
SusWrite 9.6
19% 14.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
70% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.61%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16KTF1G64AZ-1G9P1 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
58.8% Above average
MC Read 22.1
MC Write 22.2
MC Mixed 18
59% 20.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 18.7
51% 17.8 GB/s
Latency 84.8
47% 84.8 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 58.8%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ESPRIMO P710 Builds (Compare 647 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu ESPRIMO P710

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback