Asus K52Jr

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.18% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus K52Jr  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K52Jr
Memory1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit barev
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100602
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 09 '21 at 20:58
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 M 460-$130
Socket 989, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
44% Average
Memory 60.9
1-Core 64.7
2-Core 107
47% 77.6 Pts
4-Core 159
8-Core 155
21% 157 Pts
64-Core 159
10% 159 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 44%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5470
Asus(1043 1BF2) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.18% Terrible
Lighting 1.4
Reflection 3
Parallax 1.9
1% 2.1 fps
MRender 2.1
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 1.9
1% 1.5 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.18%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 750GB (2010)-$70
466GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0002SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 44 31 73 91 79 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
49.5% Average
Read 107
Write 105
Mixed 59.2
SusWrite 65.5
62% 84.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
118% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 62%
ST1000LM 014-SSHD-8GB 1TB
878GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 23 23 23 23 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
20.5% Poor
Read 23.8
Write 19.9
Mixed 10.6
SusWrite 22.6
25% 19.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 1.1
173% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 20.5%
Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR256X64D3S1333C9 80AD HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 4GB
1067, 1067 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
23.7% Poor
MC Read 7.6
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 10
23% 8.13 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 6.2
18% 6.27 GB/s
Latency 125
32% 125 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 23.7%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical K52Jr Builds (Compare 62 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus K52Jr

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 40% - Below average Total price: $227
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback