ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP 510-p105nf

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Gunboat	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	4.33% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	HP 510-p105nf (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 81B4
Memory	3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160923
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Nov 08 '21 at 16:43
Run Duration	275 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6400T 8,631 User benchmarks, average bench 61% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	68.6% Good	Memory 82.9 1-Core 88 2-Core 167 66% 113 Pts	4-Core 315 8-Core 317 42% 316 Pts	64-Core 316 20% 316 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 68.6% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 330 140 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Device(1B0A 90F1) 2GB CLim: 855 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 16.6 Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	4.33% Terrible	Lighting 5.3 Reflection 5.8 Parallax 8.2 4% 6.43 fps	MRender 3.7 Gravity 6.3 Splatting 5.7 4% 5.23 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.33% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 308GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 53 71 58 82 68 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	49.1% Average	Read 108 Write 156 Mixed 102 SusWrite 63.1 80% 107 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1.1 208% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 49.1% Great: 109%
Samsung M3 Portable 1TB 6,502 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 393GB free Firmware: 1306 SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 73 74 74 74 74 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	44.7% Average	Read 82.9 Write 50.3 Mixed 49 SusWrite 73 47% 63.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.6 108% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 44.7% Great: 59%
Asmt 2105 1TB 725 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 288GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 33 33 33 30 31 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	20.3% Poor	Read 38 Write 36.6 Mixed 26.1 SusWrite 32.1 24% 33.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 152% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 20.3% Great: 92%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 16GB-$6 19,339 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 1GB free, PID 5581 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.3 7.1 7.9 7.9 7.1 8.4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	10.7% Very poor	Read 35.7 Write 6.3 Mixed 21.1 SusWrite 7.8 20% 17.7 MB/s	4K Read 4.3 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 1.9 111% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.7% Great: 35%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1K43BB1-CPB 1x8GB 7,085 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	38.5% Below average	MC Read 14.3 MC Write 12.9 MC Mixed 11.1 36% 12.8 GB/s	SC Read 11 SC Write 13.2 SC Mixed 12.1 35% 12.1 GB/s	Latency 75.4 53% 75.4 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 38.5% Great: 41%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical 510-p105nf Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

System: HP 510-p105nf

CPU
Core i5-6400TIntelBench 61%, 8,631 samples	4x

GPU
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	3x
Radeon R5 330AMDBench 4%, 140 samples	1x

RAM
M378A1K43BB1-CPB 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 7,085 samples	3x
M378A1K43BB1-CPB M378A5244CB0-CRC 12GBSamsungBench 52%, 22 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback