Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING H570-PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING H570-PRO  (all builds)
Memory2.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20210427
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateOct 29 '21 at 21:22
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-10100F-$68
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
37.2% Below average
Memory 56.7
1-Core 37.5
2-Core 60.7
34% 51.6 Pts
4-Core 96.3
8-Core 286
21% 191 Pts
64-Core 384
24% 384 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 37.2%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Nvidia(10DE 0000) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 340.52
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
3.84% Terrible
Lighting 5.1
Reflection 1.8
Parallax 2.1
4% 3 fps
MRender 4.1
Gravity 5
Splatting 3.1
3% 4.07 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.84%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte SSD 240GB-$27
179GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 290 112 79 79 81 78 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
45.7% Average
Read 321
Write 295
Mixed 267
SusWrite 120
56% 251 MB/s
4K Read 13.5
4K Write 25.3
4K Mixed 14
52% 17.6 MB/s
DQ Read 238
DQ Write 195
DQ Mixed 179
144% 204 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 91%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$22
451GB free
Firmware: 77.04D.C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 90 90 91 90 91 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
56.3% Above average
Read 106
Write 100
Mixed 59.8
SusWrite 90
65% 89 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CB8GU2666.C8PT 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38.1% Below average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 11.9
40% 14 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 8.6
SC Mixed 7.3
27% 9.3 GB/s
Latency 138
29% 138 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING H570-PRO Builds (Compare 484 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING H570-PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $468
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback