Asrock N68C-GS FX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics13.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive17.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsrock N68C-GS FX  (all builds)
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121031
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 22 '17 at 16:29
Run Duration294 Seconds
Run User LVA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 960T-$469
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
55.5% Above average
Memory 81.8
1-Core 49
2-Core 99.4
50% 76.7 Pts
4-Core 174
8-Core 166
23% 170 Pts
64-Core 175
11% 175 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6850
Sapphire(174B 174B) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
13.3% Very poor
Lighting 17.5
Reflection 13.6
Parallax 14.7
14% 15.3 fps
MRender 12
Gravity 11.5
Splatting 17.2
12% 13.6 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.3%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend SSD340 128GB-$88
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVN2
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
17.2% Very poor
Read 173
Write 10.1
Mixed 22
14% 68.3 MB/s
4K Read 4.18
4K Write 35.2
4K Mixed 5.24
32% 14.9 MB/s
DQ Read 5.84
DQ Write 12.6
DQ Mixed 2.85
4% 7.09 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 17.2%
Great: 84%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
18GB free
Firmware: 1AJ1
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
57.9% Above average
Read 91.8
Write 110
Mixed 82.4
71% 94.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.53
4K Write 2.08
4K Mixed 0.41
106% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 57.9%
Great: 75%
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40
2GB free
Firmware: CR10
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
35.4% Below average
Read 53.4
Write 69.9
Mixed 38.3
40% 53.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.06
4K Mixed 0.29
68% 0.58 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 44%
Hitachi HTS54757 750GB
16GB free, PID 1068
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
9.6% Terrible
Read 20.8
Write 20.6
Mixed 6.53
19% 16 MB/s
4K Read 0.33
4K Write 0.66
4K Mixed 0.1
27% 0.36 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.6%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965525-084.A00LF ST51264BA160B.16F0 8GB
533, 533 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31.1% Below average
MC Read 12.9
MC Write 6.9
MC Mixed 11.8
30% 10.5 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 8.8
21% 7.33 GB/s
Latency 77.3
52% 77.3 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N68C-GS FX Builds (Compare 156 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock N68C-GS FX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $118
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback