Microelectronics G901

Performance Results


Gaming 90% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 129% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	158% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	202% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Microelectronics G901 (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)
Memory	22.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210721
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 28 '21 at 12:48
Run Duration	376 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$228 60,132 User benchmarks, average bench 99% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg) Relative performance (0^th percentile)	53.4% Above average	Memory 73.6 1-Core 57.6 2-Core 104 49% 78.6 Pts	4-Core 178 8-Core 578 41% 378 Pts	64-Core 2,331 144% 2,331 Pts
Poor: 87% ↑ This bench: 53.4% Great: 108%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$550 424,051 User benchmarks, average bench 187% EVGA(3842 4897) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 496.13 Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	158% Outstanding	Lighting 207 Reflection 226 Parallax 284 169% 239 fps	MRender 298 Gravity 224 Splatting 165 180% 229 fps
Poor: 163% ↑ This bench: 158% Great: 202%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WDC WDS200T2B0C-00PXH0 2TB 7,836 User benchmarks, average bench 228% 1TB free (System drive) Firmware: 21705000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1765 1402 757 786 787 782 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	202% Outstanding	Read 1,634 Write 1,661 Mixed 1,379 SusWrite 1,047 322% 1,430 MB/s	4K Read 43.2 4K Write 91.9 4K Mixed 46.2 173% 60.4 MB/s	DQ Read 493 DQ Write 370 DQ Mixed 444 329% 436 MB/s
Poor: 158% ↑ This bench: 202% Great: 283%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$159 200,600 User benchmarks, average bench 336% 1TB free Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1753 1761 1767 1768 1612 1427 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	284% Outstanding	Read 2,318 Write 1,763 Mixed 1,708 SusWrite 1,681 419% 1,868 MB/s	4K Read 53.7 4K Write 96.1 4K Mixed 66.9 218% 72.2 MB/s	DQ Read 541 DQ Write 384 DQ Mixed 492 359% 472 MB/s
Poor: 223% ↑ This bench: 284% Great: 435%
Samsung 840 Pro 512GB-$129 14,996 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 93GB free Firmware: DXM06B0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 435 438 439 441 442 443 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	91.3% Outstanding	Read 401 Write 228 Mixed 355 SusWrite 439 80% 356 MB/s	4K Read 29.2 4K Write 61 4K Mixed 37.7 125% 42.6 MB/s	DQ Read 230 DQ Write 193 DQ Mixed 149 129% 191 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 91.3% Great: 118%
Samsung 870 QVO 4TB-$294 10,028 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 3TB free Firmware: SVQ02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 877 468 469 469 467 469 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 70% Great: 128%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$51 144,544 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 1.5TB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 156 153 154 155 155 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	90.6% Outstanding	Read 161 Write 141 Mixed 102 SusWrite 154 103% 140 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 3.6 4K Mixed 1 219% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 90.6% Great: 112%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 123GB 2,761 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 115GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 16 14 14 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	10.1% Very poor	Read 35.7 Write 12 Mixed 7.7 SusWrite 15.4 20% 17.7 MB/s	4K Read 4.1 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.5 39% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 10.1% Great: 35%
9 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 63GB free, PID fafa Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 16 16 14 16 16 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	8.1% Terrible	Read 20.5 Write 9.5 Mixed 9.7 SusWrite 15.2 17% 13.7 MB/s	4K Read 7.7 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 29% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 8.1% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown NMUD416E86-3200D 2x16GB 3,261 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	114% Outstanding	MC Read 44.1 MC Write 40.7 MC Mixed 42.9 122% 42.6 GB/s	SC Read 30.6 SC Write 23.8 SC Mixed 37 87% 30.5 GB/s	Latency 93.4 43% 93.4 ns
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 138%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical G901 Builds (Compare 159 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 183%

UFO

Desktop 102%

UFO

Workstation 201%

UFO

System: Microelectronics G901

CPU
Ryzen 9 5900XAMD $228Bench 99%, 60,132 samples	156x
Ryzen 9 5950XAMD $355Bench 100%, 33,026 samples	1x
Ryzen 9 3900XAMD $375Bench 88%, 197,342 samples	1x

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $550Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	153x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1x
RTX 2080S (Super)Nvidia $466Bench 131%, 261,508 samples	1x

SSD
WDS200T2B0C-00PXH0 2TBWDCBench 228%, 7,836 samples	134x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $165Bench 402%, 182,136 samples	5x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	2x

RAM
NMUD416E86-3200D 2x16GBUnknownBench 101%, 3,261 samples	102x
NMUD416F82-3200D 2x16GBUnknownBench 96%, 578 samples	29x
F4-3600C18-32GVK 4x31.8GBG.SKILLBench 116%, 1,086 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $778

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353