Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-P15FV2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-P15FV2  (all builds)
Memory3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20140506
Uptime33.9 Days
Run DateOct 23 '21 at 20:46
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4810MQ-$400
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
70% Very good
Memory 79.3
1-Core 105
2-Core 189
72% 124 Pts
4-Core 328
8-Core 500
51% 414 Pts
64-Core 509
32% 509 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 70%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Clevo(1558 6501) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.14.5180
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
3.1% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 6.5
3% 4.23 fps
MRender 4.6
Gravity 2.6
Splatting 5
3% 4.07 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.1%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M550 mSATA 256GB-$220
114GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 331 251 219 213 213 214 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
62.8% Good
Read 390
Write 378
Mixed 225
SusWrite 240
69% 308 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 35
4K Mixed 26.5
89% 28.5 MB/s
DQ Read 156
DQ Write 63.3
DQ Mixed 87.3
71% 102 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 106%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
143GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 87 88 88 87 88 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
48.8% Average
Read 83
Write 76.8
Mixed 21.7
SusWrite 86.9
49% 67.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
105% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Transcend TS1GSK64W6H 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
26.1% Poor
MC Read 9
MC Write 8.7
MC Mixed 7.3
24% 8.33 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 8.7
SC Mixed 7.6
22% 7.73 GB/s
Latency 81.9
49% 81.9 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-P15FV2 Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P15FV2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $36
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback