Asus EX-B460M-V5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics3.88% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive89.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus EX-B460M-V5  (all builds)
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210129
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 23 '21 at 14:20
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400-$126
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
92.4% Outstanding
Memory 89.9
1-Core 130
2-Core 261
89% 160 Pts
4-Core 510
8-Core 833
82% 672 Pts
64-Core 1,057
65% 1,057 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Asus(1043 85E7) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.88% Terrible
Lighting 4.6
Reflection 6.3
Parallax 5
4% 5.3 fps
MRender 6.4
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 5
4% 5.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.88%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD240G 240GB
193GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T1125A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 415 420 435 413 439 432 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Read 505
Write 411
Mixed 360
SusWrite 426
96% 425 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 99.1
4K Mixed 19.8
114% 47.7 MB/s
DQ Read 113
DQ Write 321
DQ Mixed 28
76% 154 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 89%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
453GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 202 204 203 206 205 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 209
Write 42
Mixed 70.9
SusWrite 204
96% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 118%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
38.9% Below average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 13.2
MC Mixed 9.7
36% 12.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 12.5
37% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 67.4
59% 67.4 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EX-B460M-V5 Builds (Compare 406 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus EX-B460M-V5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $182
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback