Today's hottest deals

Asus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics86.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive253% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER  (all builds)
Memory14.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160325
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateOct 23 '21 at 06:30
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 26%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$127
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Memory 91.5
1-Core 134
2-Core 252
89% 159 Pts
4-Core 419
8-Core 704
68% 562 Pts
64-Core 721
45% 721 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 465.89
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Lighting 108
Reflection 114
Parallax 105
88% 109 fps
MRender 96.9
Gravity 106
Splatting 102
83% 102 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$330
219GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 755 849 866 879 875 870 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
253% Outstanding
Read 2,082
Write 1,215
Mixed 780
SusWrite 849
273% 1,231 MB/s
4K Read 53.1
4K Write 190
4K Mixed 68.9
269% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 1,251
DQ Write 368
DQ Mixed 450
425% 689 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 253%
Great: 283%
WD WD2003FYYS-02W0B 2TB
367GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 82 83 83 83 83 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
42.8% Average
Read 65.8
Write 69.3
Mixed 68.8
SusWrite 82.5
53% 71.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
202% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 83%
Seagate Constellation ES.3 1TB-$36
295GB free
Firmware: SN04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 132 132 129 135 135 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
76.8% Very good
Read 136
Write 136
Mixed 77.5
SusWrite 131
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
189% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x16GB-$110
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.3% Very good
MC Read 27
MC Write 28.2
MC Mixed 23.4
75% 26.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 26.9
SC Mixed 22.8
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 64.9
62% 64.9 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VIII RANGER Builds (Compare 3,487 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VIII RANGER - $286

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $816
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback