Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire XC-230

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 23%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 19.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics6.39% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (67%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire XC-230  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire XC-230
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160302
Uptime9 Days
Run DateOct 20 '21 at 17:30
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU 67%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca)
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
19.5% Very poor
Memory 23.8
1-Core 31.4
2-Core 60.9
22% 38.7 Pts
4-Core 84.7
8-Core 109
12% 96.8 Pts
64-Core 124
8% 124 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 340
Sapphire(174B D340) 2GB
CLim: 780 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.40
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
6.39% Terrible
Lighting 8.1
Reflection 9.1
Parallax 10.7
7% 9.3 fps
MRender 7.6
Gravity 8.1
Splatting 6.5
6% 7.4 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.39%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HUH721212ALE600 12TB
2.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: LEGNT925
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 173 200 174 192 193 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
69.4% Good
Read 56
Write 150
Mixed 60.1
SusWrite 185
82% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 1.4
263% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 136%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GU6BFR8A-PB 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
17% Very poor
MC Read 7.3
MC Write 5
MC Mixed 6.2
18% 6.17 GB/s
SC Read 4.3
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 4.7
12% 4.33 GB/s
Latency 294
14% 294 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 17%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire XC-230 Builds (Compare 38 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire XC-230

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $39
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $147
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback