Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP Notebook

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 21% Surfboard	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.32% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	29% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Notebook (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 80C5
Memory	4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20151225
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 19 '21 at 14:27
Run Duration	222 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	21%

PC Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium N3700 11,299 User benchmarks, average bench 26% CHV, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	21.1% Poor	Memory 26.9 1-Core 23.1 2-Core 47.2 20% 32.4 Pts	4-Core 89.5 8-Core 89.8 12% 89.7 Pts	64-Core 84.7 5% 84.7 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 21.1% Great: 32%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 60,712 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 80C5) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5171 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	1.32% Terrible	Lighting 1.6 Reflection 0.7 Parallax 3.3 1% 1.87 fps	MRender 1.5 Gravity 1.8 Splatting 1.6 1% 1.63 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.32% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSD 240GB 38,401 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 155GB free (System drive) Firmware: T0317A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 309 12 101 76 51 42 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	29% Poor	Read 382 Write 358 Mixed 17.2 SusWrite 98.2 47% 214 MB/s	4K Read 9.6 4K Write 8.9 4K Mixed 0.5 20% 6.33 MB/s	DQ Read 94.6 DQ Write 12.3 DQ Mixed 12.8 20% 39.9 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 29% Great: 95%
Generic Flash Disk 126GB 356 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 117GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 9.9 4.8 0 4.8 3.9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	4.86% Terrible	Read 20.9 Write 5.7 Mixed 10.2 SusWrite 4.6 12% 10.3 MB/s	4K Read 3.5 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 13% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.86% Great: 30%
Patriot Memory 124GB 700 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 94GB free, PID 6000 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 21 35 26 28 34 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	9.17% Terrible	Read 20.4 Write 15.9 Mixed 17.4 SusWrite 26.2 27% 20 MB/s	4K Read 2.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 1.2 49% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 9.17% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73EB0-YK0 1x8GB 39,427 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	14.3% Very poor	MC Read 4.7 MC Write 6.2 MC Mixed 4.6 15% 5.17 GB/s	SC Read 2.6 SC Write 4.4 SC Mixed 2.7 9% 3.23 GB/s	Latency 274 15% 274 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 14.3% Great: 33%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Notebook Builds (Compare 8,046 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: HP Notebook

CPU
Core i5-6200UIntelBench 41%, 135,462 samples	1,179x
Core i3-5005UIntelBench 38%, 50,603 samples	1,057x
Core i5-7200UIntelBench 45%, 205,332 samples	1,018x

GPU
HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 4%, 362,113 samples	2,577x
HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 387,149 samples	1,803x
HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)IntelBench 4%, 231,498 samples	1,213x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $25Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	254x
BX500 240GBCrucial $23Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	157x
A400 480GBKingston $35Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	156x

RAM
M471B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 23%, 50,921 samples	415x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	392x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	356x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 23% - Poor

Total price: $25

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350