Today's hottest deals

HP ZBook 17 G6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.02% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive175% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHP ZBook 17 G6  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 860C
Memory27 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190925
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateOct 16 '21 at 11:41
Run Duration203 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E-2286M
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
65.6% Good
Memory 79.6
1-Core 138
2-Core 293
91% 170 Pts
4-Core 308
8-Core 259
39% 284 Pts
64-Core 360
22% 360 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
HP(103C 860C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8190
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
4.02% Terrible
Lighting 4.5
Reflection 58
Parallax 5.3
4% 22.6 fps
MRender 7.4
Gravity 4
Splatting 5.9
5% 5.77 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.02%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kxg60znv1t02 KIOXIA 1TB
759GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AGHA4101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 743 589 706 860 895 591 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
175% Outstanding
Read 990
Write 1,080
Mixed 852
SusWrite 731
206% 913 MB/s
4K Read 41
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 61.2
194% 67.5 MB/s
DQ Read 527
DQ Write 843
DQ Mixed 380
374% 584 MB/s
Poor: 97%
This bench: 175%
Great: 295%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB
887GB free
Firmware: RPM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 167 162 168 168 172 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
83.4% Excellent
Read 124
Write 172
Mixed 73.8
SusWrite 167
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
161% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 83.4%
Great: 95%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 32GB
29GB free, PID 0cc7
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 10 10 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
5.2% Terrible
Read 16.2
Write 13.6
Mixed 13.7
SusWrite 11
18% 13.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
7% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.2%
Great: 29%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A4G43MB1-CTD 1x31GB
1 of 4 slots used
31GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40.1% Average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 11.8
MC Mixed 12.2
38% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 13.9
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 81.3
49% 81.3 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ZBook 17 G6 Builds (Compare 568 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: HP ZBook 17 G6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback