Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire ES1-524

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.79% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire ES1-524  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Tricera_BS
Memory7.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161012
Uptime9.4 Days
Run DateAug 19 '17 at 15:42
Run Duration106 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A9-9410 APU (2016 M.SR)
Socket FP4, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
35.4% Below average
Memory 62.2
1-Core 56.7
2-Core 83.6
43% 67.5 Pts
4-Core 49.7
8-Core 83.5
8% 66.6 Pts
64-Core 69
4% 69 Pts
Poor: 15%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
Acer(1025 1087) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 16.101.2901.0
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
2.79% Terrible
Lighting 3.33
Reflection 5.77
Parallax 4.91
3% 4.67 fps
MRender 2.52
Gravity 3.6
Splatting 4.26
3% 3.46 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.79%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$32
859GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AX1P5J Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
53% Above average
Read 93
Write 91.7
Mixed 94.2
70% 93 MB/s
4K Read 0.28
4K Write 1.14
4K Mixed 0.2
55% 0.54 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 53%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AO1L16BC4R1-BQSS Kingston D3L16D28MP-8G-ACER 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
14.1% Very poor
MC Read 5.7
MC Write 4.4
MC Mixed 3.8
13% 4.63 GB/s
SC Read 0.8
SC Write 2
SC Mixed 4.9
7% 2.57 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire ES1-524 Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire ES1-524

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 5% - Terrible Total price: $150
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback