Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING Z490-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics4.56% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive227% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING Z490-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200528
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 15 '21 at 06:40
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User IRN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700K-$249
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Memory 88.5
1-Core 153
2-Core 303
99% 182 Pts
4-Core 599
8-Core 1,067
100% 833 Pts
64-Core 1593
99% 1593 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 100%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9127
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
4.56% Terrible
Lighting 6.1
Reflection 10.1
Parallax 9.1
5% 8.43 fps
MRender 7.8
Gravity 7.8
Splatting 0.1
4% 5.23 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.56%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
XPG SPECTRIX S40G 256GB
87GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VB411D45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 681 387 180 123 109 133 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
227% Outstanding
Read 2,493
Write 1,120
Mixed 1,091
SusWrite 269
273% 1,243 MB/s
4K Read 55.7
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 72.3
245% 85.2 MB/s
DQ Read 736
DQ Write 820
DQ Mixed 773
583% 776 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 227%
Great: 273%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
466GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 474 480 484 478 444 356 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 512
Write 481
Mixed 444
SusWrite 453
106% 472 MB/s
4K Read 44.7
4K Write 89.3
4K Mixed 56.5
187% 63.5 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 351
264% 353 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 122%
Great: 129%
Plextor PX-128M7VG 128GB
84GB free
Firmware: 1.02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 138 140 136 139 140 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
75.2% Very good
Read 420
Write 156
Mixed 238
SusWrite 140
53% 238 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Write 56.8
4K Mixed 39
122% 41.2 MB/s
DQ Read 349
DQ Write 163
DQ Mixed 110
121% 208 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 75.2%
Great: 90%
WD WD20EZAZ-00WGYX0 2TB
646GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 182 184 181 185 184 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 194
Write 172
Mixed 106
SusWrite 182
120% 164 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 8
4K Mixed 0.8
287% 3.33 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 108%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3000 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37.5% Below average
MC Read 14.6
MC Write 13.3
MC Mixed 9.4
36% 12.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 12.3
SC Mixed 9.6
31% 10.7 GB/s
Latency 69.1
58% 69.1 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING Z490-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 5,556 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 143%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 142%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING Z490-PLUS (WI-FI) - $201

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $988
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback