Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.74% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N4000 14,024 User benchmarks, average bench 24% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	31.4% Below average	Memory 44.3 1-Core 50.4 2-Core 109 38% 67.8 Pts	4-Core 108 8-Core 108 14% 108 Pts	64-Core 107 7% 107 Pts
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 31.4% Great: 33%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Acer(1025 1293) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7323 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.74% Terrible	Lighting 1.9 Reflection 2.4 Parallax 1.5 2% 1.93 fps	MRender 2.9 Gravity 1.8 Splatting 2.9 2% 2.53 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.74% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
SDXC Card 128GB 9,908 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 66GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 24 26 24 27 28 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	12.4% Very poor	Read 24.7 Write 27.4 Mixed 24.3 SusWrite 24.7 35% 25.3 MB/s	4K Read 4 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 1.1 79% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 12.4% Great: 45%
USB DISK 3.0 64GB 103 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 6GB free, PID 0031 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 4.2 4.5 5 10 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	3.65% Terrible	Read 9.2 Write 7.8 Mixed 8.5 SusWrite 6.4 11% 7.97 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.4 25% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.65% Great: 25%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 4x1GB 93 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 4 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (34^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	18% Very poor	MC Read 5.3 MC Write 7.8 MC Mixed 6.2 18% 6.43 GB/s	SC Read 2.8 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 3.7 11% 3.83 GB/s	Latency 183 22% 183 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 18% Great: 28%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM