Today's hottest deals

Asrock A320M-DGS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics33.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock A320M-DGS  (all builds)
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.1 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180420
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 10 '21 at 20:59
Run Duration223 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$75
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
78.8% Very good
Memory 81.8
1-Core 96.4
2-Core 191
71% 123 Pts
4-Core 438
8-Core 436
58% 437 Pts
64-Core 434
27% 434 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 380-$200
Asus(1043 0498) 2GB
CLim: 970 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
33.7% Below average
Lighting 42.6
Reflection 46.3
Parallax 54.6
35% 47.8 fps
MRender 45.4
Gravity 42.2
Splatting 32
32% 39.9 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 35%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64
519GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 66 75 65 57 69 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
54.7% Above average
Read 122
Write 52.3
Mixed 80.5
SusWrite 68.1
60% 80.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 3066 MHz clocked @ 1533 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
103% Outstanding
MC Read 38.1
MC Write 38.8
MC Mixed 36.8
108% 37.9 GB/s
SC Read 23.7
SC Write 38
SC Mixed 26.5
84% 29.4 GB/s
Latency 77.3
52% 77.3 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 103%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-DGS Builds (Compare 468 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-DGS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $169
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback