Gigabyte B450 AORUS PRO WIFI

Performance Results


Gaming 57% Gunboat	Desktop 90% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 53% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	60% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	89% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Gigabyte B450 AORUS PRO WIFI
Motherboard	Gigabyte B450 AORUS PRO WIFI (all builds)
Memory	43.3 GB free of 48 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210204
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 10 '21 at 02:56
Run Duration	303 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 590 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$145 179,588 User benchmarks, average bench 73% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	81.7% Excellent	Memory 84.4 1-Core 119 2-Core 235 82% 146 Pts	4-Core 425 8-Core 715 69% 570 Pts	64-Core 934 58% 934 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 81.7% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 590-$200 122,060 User benchmarks, average bench 57% XFX(1682 9587) CLim: 1580 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.6.1 Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	60% Good	Lighting 76.7 Reflection 71 Parallax 105 62% 84.4 fps	MRender 70.7 Gravity 83.1 Splatting 54 55% 69.3 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 60% Great: 62%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk S3 500G 500GB 12,292 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 62GB free (System drive) Firmware: 415000RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 127 131 99 141 65 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	89% Excellent	Read 494 Write 300 Mixed 241 SusWrite 125 64% 290 MB/s	4K Read 36.1 4K Write 85.6 4K Mixed 39.9 151% 53.9 MB/s	DQ Read 382 DQ Write 308 DQ Mixed 258 217% 316 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 89% Great: 116%
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB 34,988 User benchmarks, average bench 239% 244GB free Firmware: 4L2QEXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1123 1113 1153 1151 1160 1160 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	236% Outstanding	Read 1,351 Write 1,186 Mixed 1,130 SusWrite 1,143 271% 1,203 MB/s	4K Read 56.1 4K Write 112 4K Mixed 72.7 237% 80.1 MB/s	DQ Read 976 DQ Write 749 DQ Mixed 835 632% 854 MB/s
Poor: 145% ↑ This bench: 236% Great: 329%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90 262,559 User benchmarks, average bench 251% 19GB free Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,706 Write 2,222 Mixed 1,601 413% 1,843 MB/s	4K Read 55.4 4K Write 125 4K Mixed 75 246% 85.1 MB/s	DQ Read 992 DQ Write 640 DQ Mixed 851 625% 828 MB/s
Poor: 149% Great: 365%
Seagate ST10000NM0016-1T 10TB 41 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 65GB free Firmware: SND0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 216 216 219 220 218 220 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 13% Great: 110%
TOSHIBA MQ01ABD075 750GB 21 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 90GB free, PID 2338 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 17 17 17 17 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	13.6% Very poor	Read 37 Write 38.8 Mixed 23.9 SusWrite 17.3 38% 29.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.5 66% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 13.6% Great: 19%
TOSHIBA MQ01ABF050M 500GB 466GB free, PID 2338 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	3.09% Terrible	Read 0.7 Write 0.7 Mixed 0.7 SusWrite 0.7 1% 0.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.4 45% 0.53 MB/s

WDC WD10 01FALS-00J7B1 1TB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 19GB free, PID 2338 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 21 21 21 21 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	18.3% Very poor	Read 36.3 Write 37.8 Mixed 32.5 SusWrite 20.7 43% 31.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 0.9 125% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 18.3% Great: 23%
ST310005 28AS 1TB 23 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 19GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 21 21 22 22 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	14.9% Very poor	Read 37.4 Write 35.4 Mixed 29.3 SusWrite 21.4 41% 30.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 1 88% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 14.9% Great: 37%
WDC WD10 01FALS-00J7B1 1TB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 19GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	2.43% Terrible	Read 0.7 Write 0.7 Mixed 0.7 SusWrite 0.4 1% 0.62 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.5 42% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.43% Great: 23%
WD My Book 1TB 10,299 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 19GB free, PID 1100 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 38 38 38 39 39 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	20.6% Poor	Read 37.2 Write 36.1 Mixed 32 SusWrite 38.2 49% 35.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.8 105% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 20.6% Great: 22%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 9,009 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 19GB free, PID a006 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 88 105 109 107 110 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	63.2% Good	Read 120 Write 107 Mixed 80.5 SusWrite 101 136% 102 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 7.6 4K Mixed 0.8 291% 3.3 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 63.2% Great: 43%
ST1000LM 014-1EJ164 1TB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 18GB free, PID 2338 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 17 17 18 17 18 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	26.6% Poor	Read 37.1 Write 16.6 Mixed 30.8 SusWrite 17.5 32% 25.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 5.6 4K Mixed 1.4 241% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 26.6% Great: 32%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F4-3200C16-8GSXWB F4-3200C16-16GVK F4-3200C16-8GSXWB F4-3200C16-16GVK 48GB 3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz 8192, 16384, 8192, 16384 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	115% Outstanding	MC Read 45.6 MC Write 43.3 MC Mixed 36.7 120% 41.9 GB/s	SC Read 28.3 SC Write 42.3 SC Mixed 33.3 99% 34.6 GB/s	Latency 72.7 55% 72.7 ns

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-B450 AORUS PRO WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 7,362 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 124%

UFO

Desktop 90%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 117%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte B450 AORUS PRO WIFI - $140

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $90Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	1,363x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $200Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	931x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $110Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	734x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	534x
RTX 3060Nvidia $283Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	471x
RTX 2060Nvidia $290Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	427x

SSD
Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBWD $74Bench 228%, 180,890 samples	242x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $86Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	187x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	180x

RAM
TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GBUnknownBench 85%, 99,207 samples	365x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	318x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $63Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	292x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Excellent

Total price: $804

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16