Intel X79

Performance Results


Gaming 35% Sail boat	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 30% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	55.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	58.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Intel X64
Motherboard	Intel X79 (all builds)
Memory	11.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1804 x 1014 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200923
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 06 '21 at 13:43
Run Duration	241 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 2,742 User benchmarks, average bench 60% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	57.5% Above average	Memory 72.9 1-Core 49.4 2-Core 124 50% 82.2 Pts	4-Core 229 8-Core 375 37% 302 Pts	64-Core 462 29% 462 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 57.5% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% MSI(1462 3283) CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.47 Performing below potential (44^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	55.5% Above average	Lighting 68.7 Reflection 72.9 Parallax 66.3 56% 69.3 fps	MRender 64.8 Gravity 70.1 Splatting 64.9 54% 66.6 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 55.5% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Lexar 256GB SSD 256GB 12,615 User benchmarks, average bench 111% 79GB free (System drive) Firmware: H190117D SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 220 212 216 216 127 MB/s Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	58.2% Above average	Read 240 Write 226 Mixed 234 SusWrite 202 51% 225 MB/s	4K Read 25 4K Write 34 4K Mixed 26.6 90% 28.5 MB/s	DQ Read 201 DQ Write 174 DQ Mixed 187 140% 187 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 58.2% Great: 240%
General UDisk 126GB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 28GB free, PID 04d2 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.5 7.2 6.3 8.2 11 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	5.38% Terrible	Read 16.7 Write 12 Mixed 12.4 SusWrite 7.3 16% 12.1 MB/s	4K Read 5.8 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.1 25% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.38% Great: 28%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B5170GB0- 2x4GB 1,540 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	49.5% Average	MC Read 21.2 MC Write 17.2 MC Mixed 17.8 54% 18.7 GB/s	SC Read 11 SC Write 7.6 SC Mixed 7.6 25% 8.73 GB/s	Latency 94.9 42% 94.9 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 49.5% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 24: 1R 5G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
24%	23%	44	302	230	60	0.7"	1804 1014	VES3700 32W_LCD_TV

History: Score 1: 0R 0G 1B | Score 24: 1R 5G 4B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X79 Builds (Compare 1,982 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 35%

Jet ski

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 32%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Intel X79

CPU
Xeon E5-2689 0IntelBench 71%, 6,987 samples	339x
Xeon E5-2650 v2IntelBench 67%, 5,123 samples	270x
Xeon E5-2640 0IntelBench 65%, 3,274 samples	144x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	126x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	115x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	109x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	64x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	45x
256GB 256GBSSDBench 77%, 9,229 samples	36x

RAM
M393B5170GB0- 2x4GBSamsungBench 52%, 1,540 samples	127x
M393B1K70DH0- 2x8GBSamsungBench 54%, 1,683 samples	63x
HMT151R7BFR4C 4x4GBHynixBench 67%, 393 samples	58x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $158

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16