Razer Blade

Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	4.04% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	131% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Razer Blade (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer CH530
Memory	8.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190919
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 30 '21 at 21:03
Run Duration	151 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	50%

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9750H 328,182 User benchmarks, average bench 73% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	76.3% Very good	Memory 81.9 1-Core 104 2-Core 231 77% 139 Pts	4-Core 381 8-Core 582 60% 482 Pts	64-Core 744 46% 744 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 76.3% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Device(1A58 2005) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8783 Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	4.04% Terrible	Lighting 3.7 Reflection 106 Parallax 4.1 3% 37.9 fps	MRender 11.2 Gravity 7.5 Splatting 4.7 6% 7.8 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.04% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB 80,540 User benchmarks, average bench 217% 121GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXA7301Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 695 423 383 373 368 365 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	131% Outstanding	Read 798 Write 809 Mixed 745 SusWrite 434 157% 697 MB/s	4K Read 53.7 4K Write 99 4K Mixed 67.9 221% 73.5 MB/s	DQ Read 47.3 DQ Write 114 DQ Mixed 56.9 50% 72.6 MB/s
Poor: 130% ↑ This bench: 131% Great: 296%
USB DISK 3.0 248GB 100 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 82GB free, PID 6400 Operating at USB 3.2 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 5.9 24 4.8 25 24 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	60.8% Good	Read 258 Write 130 Mixed 149 SusWrite 27.8 166% 141 MB/s	4K Read 12.3 4K Write 4.7 4K Mixed 5.9 406% 7.63 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 60.8% Great: 61%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB 108,106 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	79.1% Very good	MC Read 31.1 MC Write 30 MC Mixed 23.1 80% 28.1 GB/s	SC Read 16.9 SC Write 32.1 SC Mixed 26.1 72% 25 GB/s	Latency 77.1 52% 77.1 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 79.1% Great: 84%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	8	6	240	15.5"	1280 720	SHP14C5 LQ156M1JW03

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Blade Builds (Compare 4,042 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 70%

Battleship

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade

CPU
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	2,071x
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples	1,072x
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	470x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	1,452x
RTX 2070 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 79%, 10,818 samples	599x
GTX 1060 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 43%, 36,643 samples	401x

SSD
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 217%, 80,540 samples	822x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 196%, 44,403 samples	287x
CA3-8D512 512GBLiteonBench 168%, 4,424 samples	249x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 108,106 samples	1,766x
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 43,895 samples	372x
M471A5244BB0-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 72%, 2,214 samples	291x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16