HP Laptop 17-ca0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive53.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Laptop 17-ca0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 84D1
Memory2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190104
Uptime14.8 Days
Run DateSep 30 '21 at 15:20
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A9-9425 APU (2016 M.SR)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
34.2% Below average
Memory 55.4
1-Core 48.1
2-Core 58.8
36% 54.1 Pts
4-Core 75.1
8-Core 89.7
11% 82.4 Pts
64-Core 97.6
6% 97.6 Pts
Poor: 9%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
HP(103C 84D1) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.44
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
3.49% Terrible
Lighting 4
Reflection 12.5
Parallax 5.7
3% 7.4 fps
MRender 3.3
Gravity 4.6
Splatting 6
4% 4.63 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.49%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 480GB-$42
122GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900KA3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 231 151 238 269 163 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
53.7% Above average
Read 160
Write 358
Mixed 155
SusWrite 179
48% 213 MB/s
4K Read 14.9
4K Write 58.6
4K Mixed 29.6
92% 34.4 MB/s
DQ Read 179
DQ Write 154
DQ Mixed 149
117% 161 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 102%
TOSHIBA THNSNJ128GCSU 128GB
40GB free, PID 0718
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 13 20 21 19 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
23.3% Poor
Read 26.2
Write 22.2
Mixed 24.1
SusWrite 17.8
30% 22.6 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 4.5
329% 4.27 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 23.3%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
21.9% Poor
MC Read 7.6
MC Write 7.2
MC Mixed 7.5
21% 7.43 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 7.4
18% 6.3 GB/s
Latency 142
28% 142 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 21.9%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Laptop 17-ca0xxx Builds (Compare 194 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 17-ca0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback