Gigabyte GA-H55-UD3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics46.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory13GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 13GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H55-UD3H  (all builds)
Memory7 GB free of 13 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100820
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 29 '21 at 19:09
Run Duration256 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 870-$100
Socket 1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
68.5% Good
Memory 88.5
1-Core 80.6
2-Core 147
64% 105 Pts
4-Core 263
8-Core 399
41% 331 Pts
64-Core 391
24% 391 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1268 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.9.2
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
46.8% Average
Lighting 59.2
Reflection 59
Parallax 80.2
48% 66.1 fps
MRender 59.2
Gravity 62.2
Splatting 43.5
44% 55 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
682GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 29 38 36 36 36 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
42.2% Average
Read 217
Write 213
Mixed 200
SusWrite 34.4
37% 166 MB/s
4K Read 21.7
4K Write 45.7
4K Mixed 27.6
92% 31.7 MB/s
DQ Read 30.2
DQ Write 84.8
DQ Mixed 26.9
29% 47.3 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 121%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$75
369GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 38 38 38 37 37 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
46.3% Average
Read 222
Write 210
Mixed 210
SusWrite 37.7
38% 170 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 46.5
4K Mixed 32.1
104% 34.5 MB/s
DQ Read 35.2
DQ Write 82.1
DQ Mixed 47.6
39% 55 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 129%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$59
1TB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 76 75 57 52 51 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
67.1% Good
Read 170
Write 149
Mixed 20
SusWrite 64
73% 101 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.3
90% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 108%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100
539GB free
Firmware: 1AA01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 38 38 37 37 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
30.5% Below average
Read 68.2
Write 58.1
Mixed 50.9
SusWrite 37.7
40% 53.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
160% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 62%
Maxtor 7L250S0 250GB-$91
66GB free
Firmware: BACE1G10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 38 38 38 37 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
22.6% Poor
Read 39.4
Write 50.7
Mixed 29.5
SusWrite 37.6
29% 39.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 0.8
212% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 22.6%
Great: 36%
Seagate M3 Portable 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 61b5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 59 59 46 42 42 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
23.7% Poor
Read 57.3
Write 81.9
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 51.2
85% 61 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
71% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 23.7%
Great: 53%
Hitachi HUS724030ALE641 3TB
864GB free, PID 2773
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 59 59 46 42 42 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
36.4% Below average
Read 124
Write 129
Mixed 66.8
SusWrite 51.3
120% 92.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
105% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 61%
HitachiG ST 2TB
268GB free, PID 1015
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 57 58 45 42 42 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
29.1% Poor
Read 88.5
Write 83.9
Mixed 54
SusWrite 50.1
90% 69.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
84% 1 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 51%
Maxtor OneTouch II 300GB
60GB free, PID 7100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 21 21 21 21 21 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
21.8% Poor
Read 26.8
Write 25.3
Mixed 20.5
SusWrite 20.8
31% 23.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.1
152% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 21.8%
Great: 29%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 13GB
null MHz
8192, 2048, 2048, 1024 MB
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
39.3% Below average
MC Read 15
MC Write 12.6
MC Mixed 11.9
38% 13.2 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 10
SC Mixed 12.1
32% 11 GB/s
Latency 69.1
58% 69.1 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 7.2" 1280 720 SAM0509 SAMSUNG
Typical GA-H55-UD3H Builds (Compare 159 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H55-UD3H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $72
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback