Asus PRIME B560M-A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics49.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus PRIME B560M-A  (all builds)
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210712
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateSep 26 '21 at 21:24
Run Duration441 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400-$124
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
90.4% Outstanding
Memory 93.9
1-Core 124
2-Core 250
88% 156 Pts
4-Core 468
8-Core 778
76% 623 Pts
64-Core 1,028
64% 1,028 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 471.96
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.6% Average
Lighting 58.9
Reflection 69.7
Parallax 62.1
48% 63.6 fps
MRender 66.1
Gravity 66.2
Splatting 62
53% 64.8 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 38 33 26 26 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
43.3% Average
Read 120
Write 82
Mixed 63.4
SusWrite 30.8
55% 73.9 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
151% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 83%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 138 139 140 139 137 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
61.9% Good
Read 77.2
Write 79.6
Mixed 63
SusWrite 138
66% 89.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
178% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 83%
Seagate Barracuda Desktop 5TB-$124
2.5TB free
Firmware: CC48
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 156 155 158 158 158 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 56.8
Write 158
Mixed 59.1
SusWrite 155
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.2
24% 0.25 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 90%
Seagate ST3250310AS 250GB-$44
167GB free
Firmware: 3.AAC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 94 94 95 92 86 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
53.4% Above average
Read 93.6
Write 50.9
Mixed 53.2
SusWrite 92.4
53% 72.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 54%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
313GB free
Firmware: CC35
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 62 63 64 64 63 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
35.6% Below average
Read 61
Write 56.6
Mixed 42.5
SusWrite 63
41% 55.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 68%
Seagate BUP Slim BL 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0304
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 86 76 79 85 86 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
39.6% Below average
Read 54
Write 80.9
Mixed 85.5
SusWrite 82.8
57% 75.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 0.5
190% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 66%
WD My Passport 0827 2TB
1TB free, PID 0827
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 63 63 63 62 63 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
25.6% Poor
Read 62.9
Write 64.4
Mixed 42.3
SusWrite 62.6
78% 58.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
56% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 25.6%
Great: 43%
WDC WD16 00JD-55HBB0 160GB
149GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 40 40 40 40 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
18.4% Very poor
Read 38.4
Write 35.6
Mixed 27.2
SusWrite 39.8
48% 35.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
74% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18.4%
Great: 18%
Hitachi HTS547550A9E 500GB
90GB free, PID 0711
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 22 22 22 22 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
14.2% Very poor
Read 38.6
Write 31.1
Mixed 30
SusWrite 22.1
40% 30.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
63% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 33%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
541GB free, PID a006
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 97 97 97 97 97 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
39.6% Below average
Read 90.6
Write 97.9
Mixed 34.3
SusWrite 97.1
107% 80 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
76% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 43%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
254GB free, PID a006
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 79 79 80 80 80 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
33.7% Below average
Read 78.7
Write 80.9
Mixed 32.6
SusWrite 79.4
91% 67.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
80% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 43%
WD My Passport 0827 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0827
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 20 20 21 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
16.2% Very poor
Read 37.8
Write 32.9
Mixed 30.6
SusWrite 20.6
40% 30.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 16.2%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
50.1% Above average
MC Read 19.5
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 12.1
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 15.5
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 60.1
67% 60.1 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 29 316 233 60 54.6" 1280 720 SNY6B03 SAMSUNG
Typical PRIME B560M-A Builds (Compare 8,104 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 89%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B560M-A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 111% - Outstanding Total price: $393
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback