Today's hottest deals

Asus M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.39% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3  (all builds)
Memory3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110217
Uptime8.6 Days
Run DateSep 25 '21 at 12:47
Run Duration290 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1045T-$165
AM3, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
55.9% Above average
Memory 82.9
1-Core 44.9
2-Core 84
47% 70.6 Pts
4-Core 159
8-Core 224
24% 192 Pts
64-Core 228
14% 228 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7570
Dell(1028 2B20) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
5.39% Terrible
Lighting 6.9
Reflection 7.6
Parallax 5.8
6% 6.77 fps
MRender 7.1
Gravity 5.3
Splatting 5.8
5% 6.07 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.39%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingdian S280-240GB 240GB
138GB free
Firmware: O1015A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 37 41 64 60 76 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
9.54% Terrible
Read 85.2
Write 43
Mixed 50.4
SusWrite 51.6
13% 57.6 MB/s
4K Read 2.5
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 3.2
9% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 9.54%
Great: 100%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
128GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 31 37 62 57 75 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
36.1% Below average
Read 77.3
Write 70.1
Mixed 46.8
SusWrite 48.3
45% 60.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
113% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 51%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
1TB free, PID ab38
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 18 18 18 17 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Read 26.4
Write 49.3
Mixed 44.3
SusWrite 17.5
49% 34.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.3
53% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 75%
WD My Book 25DB 8TB
770GB free, PID 25db
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 11 10 10 14 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
9.69% Terrible
Read 35.9
Write 26.3
Mixed 23.7
SusWrite 11.9
31% 24.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.2
28% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 9.69%
Great: 62%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 4TB
2TB free, PID a0a4
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 18 18 18 17 19 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
29.7% Poor
Read 154
Write 113
Mixed 67.9
SusWrite 17.8
105% 88.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
64% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 65%
Seagate GoFlex Desk 3TB
361GB free, PID a0a4
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 18 18 17 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
28% Poor
Read 142
Write 100
Mixed 74.5
SusWrite 18
101% 83.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
68% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 28%
Great: 70%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 4TB
1.5TB free, PID a0a4
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 18 18 18 17 20 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
23.5% Poor
Read 113
Write 81
Mixed 63.9
SusWrite 18
84% 69 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
57% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 23.5%
Great: 65%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
793GB free, PID ab38
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 18 17 17 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
36.8% Below average
Read 116
Write 132
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 17.4
89% 72.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 0.5
196% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 75%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 4TB
2TB free, PID a0a4
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 18 18 18 17 18 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
31.8% Below average
Read 166
Write 104
Mixed 69.7
SusWrite 17.6
104% 89.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
63% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 65%
WD My Book 25DA 8TB
771GB free, PID 25da
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 18 17 18 17 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
35.2% Below average
Read 166
Write 144
Mixed 67.3
SusWrite 17.6
119% 98.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.2
123% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 67%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
797GB free, PID ab38
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 18 18 17 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
25.4% Poor
Read 57.8
Write 81.9
Mixed 64.2
SusWrite 17.4
75% 55.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.5
165% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 25.4%
Great: 75%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB
1TB free, PID 331a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 18 18 17 17 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
33.5% Below average
Read 94.8
Write 99.8
Mixed 85.3
SusWrite 17.4
97% 74.3 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 0.6
202% 3.13 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM3X2G1333C9 CM3X2G1333C9 CM3X2G1333C9D CM3X2G1333C9D 8GB
667, 667, 667, 667 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
32.1% Below average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 12.2
32% 11.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 5.6
SC Mixed 8
19% 6.63 GB/s
Latency 75.2
53% 75.2 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 35%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 24" 1280 720 DELA05C DELL ST2410
Typical M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3 Builds (Compare 238 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $265
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback