Asrock X99 Extreme4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics50.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive77.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X99 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory27.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160302
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 14 '17 at 15:34
Run Duration104 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel @ 2.20GHz
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
67.6% Good
Memory 79.3
1-Core 76.3
2-Core 151
61% 102 Pts
4-Core 301
8-Core 597
53% 449 Pts
64-Core 988
61% 988 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-Ti-$410
Zotac(19DA 1314) 3GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1800 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 384.76
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.7% Above average
Lighting 61.8
Reflection 63.3
Parallax 80.3
50% 68.5 fps
MRender 77.3
Gravity 67.6
Splatting 49.2
51% 64.7 fps
Poor: 47%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 59%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 845DC EVO 48 480GB
193GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
77.6% Very good
Read 507
Write 208
Mixed 216
68% 311 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 68.7
4K Mixed 27
118% 42.2 MB/s
DQ Read 259
DQ Write 151
DQ Mixed 109
107% 173 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A2G40EB1-CPB 2x16GB
2 of 8 slots used
32GB RIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
62.3% Good
MC Read 29
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 22.6
67% 23.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 14.1
SC Mixed 15.1
37% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 81.8
49% 81.8 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 821 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99 Extreme4 - $261

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $777
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback