| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 50.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 77.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
| Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Run History
| Motherboard | Asrock X99 Extreme4 (all builds) |
| Memory | 27.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20160302 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Aug 14 '17 at 15:34 |
| Run Duration | 104 Seconds |
| Run User | SWE-User |
| Background CPU | 5% |
PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel @ 2.20GHz
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
|
67.6%
Good
|
61% 102 Pts
|
53% 449 Pts
|
61% 988 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 780-Ti-$410
Zotac(19DA 1314) 3GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1800 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 384.76
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
50.7%
Above average
|
50% 68.5 fps
|
51% 64.7 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 845DC EVO 48 480GB
193GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
77.6%
Very good
|
68% 311 MB/s
|
118% 42.2 MB/s
|
107% 173 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M393A2G40EB1-CPB 2x16GB
2 of 8 slots used
32GB RIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
62.3%
Good
|
67% 23.3 GB/s
|
37% 12.8 GB/s
|
49% 81.8 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical X99 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 821 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock X99 Extreme4 - $261
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples | 476x |
| Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples | 110x |
| Core i7-5960XIntel $400Bench 80%, 15,468 samples | 48x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 86x |
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 77x |
| GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 46x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 89% - Excellent | Total price: $777 |