MSI MAG B460 TORPEDO (MS-7C81)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics94.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive191% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C81
MotherboardMSI MAG B460 TORPEDO (MS-7C81)  (all builds)
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201013
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateSep 23 '21 at 05:27
Run Duration196 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400F-$95
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
89.6% Excellent
Memory 90.5
1-Core 128
2-Core 250
88% 156 Pts
4-Core 477
8-Core 785
77% 631 Pts
64-Core 999
62% 999 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$269
Zotac(19DA 3571) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 510.10
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
94.7% Outstanding
Lighting 120
Reflection 130
Parallax 114
98% 121 fps
MRender 139
Gravity 98.3
Splatting 94.5
88% 110 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 94.7%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA2000M8500G 500GB
408GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S5Z42105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1210 1058 880 680 537 536 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
191% Outstanding
Read 1,528
Write 1,365
Mixed 1,110
SusWrite 817
270% 1,205 MB/s
4K Read 51.7
4K Write 70.2
4K Mixed 57.6
189% 59.8 MB/s
DQ Read 739
DQ Write 228
DQ Mixed 273
256% 413 MB/s
Poor: 118%
This bench: 191%
Great: 277%
WD Purple 1TB (2014)-$60
860GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 107 104 111 110 115 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
45.7% Average
Read 50.9
Write 120
Mixed 54.3
SusWrite 108
61% 83.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
126% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 85%
WD Purple Surveillance 1TB (2017)-$45
665GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 74 74 75 75 75 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
40.9% Average
Read 67.5
Write 70.4
Mixed 47.7
SusWrite 74.3
48% 65 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
173% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 89%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$45
699GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 101 100 102 102 103 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
60% Good
Read 108
Write 105
Mixed 56.4
SusWrite 101
68% 92.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 60%
Great: 62%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
775GB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 41 39 42 42 42 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
22.8% Poor
Read 37.1
Write 39.1
Mixed 29.8
SusWrite 41
27% 36.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 0.6
185% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 22.8%
Great: 66%
WDC WD10 EARS-003BB1 1TB
400GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.3 6.3 6.5 5.8 5.5 5.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
2.44% Terrible
Read 5.5
Write 5.7
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 6
8% 5.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
7% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.44%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BL8G30C15U4B.M8FE1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
76.3% Very good
MC Read 30.6
MC Write 29.1
MC Mixed 22.4
78% 27.4 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 28.2
SC Mixed 22.8
61% 21.3 GB/s
Latency 66.5
60% 66.5 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 6 60 27" 1280 720 ACI27C3 MX279
Typical MAG B460 TORPEDO (MS-7C81) Builds (Compare 1,423 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI MAG B460 TORPEDO (MS-7C81)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 108% - Outstanding Total price: $321
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback